Search for: "State v. Barone" Results 141 - 160 of 367
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jan 2011, 4:51 pm by Colin O'Keefe
- Minneapolis attorney Brent Lorentz of Winthrop Weinstine on DuetsBlog Of Flame Retardants, Autism and Skepticism - Houston lawyer David Oliver of Vorys on the firm's blog, Mass Torts: State of the Art Will The "It Was Just A Tweet" Defense Work In The First Twitter Defamation Trial? [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 4:55 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Some Questions to Ask Yourself - Columbus lawyer Teri Rasmussen of Plunkett Cooney in her Ohio Practical Business Law Blog Willow Bend v. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 1:13 am
Well, the courts saw it Uphold Our Heritage's way and the state Supreme Court refused to take an appeal in April. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 2:29 pm by Venkat Balasubramani
Presumably, this rule would not apply to directors who have obtained written releases, but the Sacha Baron Cohen’s of the world should be concerned about this. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 3:28 am by Peter Mahler
The petitioner’s allegations, if true, would not establish that “the management of the entity is unable or unwilling to reasonably permit or promote the stated purpose of the entity to be realized or achieved, or [that] continuing the entity is financially unfeasible” (Matter of 1545 Ocean Ave., LLC, 72 AD3d 121, 131; see Barone v Sowers, 128 AD3d 484; Doyle v Icon, LLC, 103 AD3d 440). [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 3:28 am by Peter Mahler
The petitioner’s allegations, if true, would not establish that “the management of the entity is unable or unwilling to reasonably permit or promote the stated purpose of the entity to be realized or achieved, or [that] continuing the entity is financially unfeasible” (Matter of 1545 Ocean Ave., LLC, 72 AD3d 121, 131; see Barone v Sowers, 128 AD3d 484; Doyle v Icon, LLC, 103 AD3d 440). [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 3:28 am by Peter Mahler
The petitioner’s allegations, if true, would not establish that “the management of the entity is unable or unwilling to reasonably permit or promote the stated purpose of the entity to be realized or achieved, or [that] continuing the entity is financially unfeasible” (Matter of 1545 Ocean Ave., LLC, 72 AD3d 121, 131; see Barone v Sowers, 128 AD3d 484; Doyle v Icon, LLC, 103 AD3d 440). [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 1:29 pm by ADeStefano
 Second Department Concludes That Pre-Judgment Interest Is Not Triggered By a Stipulation of LiabilityIn Mahoney v. [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 1:29 pm by ADeStefano
 Second Department Concludes That Pre-Judgment Interest Is Not Triggered By a Stipulation of LiabilityIn Mahoney v. [read post]