Search for: "State v. Baros"
Results 41 - 60
of 190
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Nov 2008, 6:14 pm
Baroness Hale went on to say: 57. [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 2:03 pm
It is arguable that Article 10 places the state under a positive obligation to provide such access. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 11:28 am
Lord Carlile and others v Secretary of State for the Home Department – read judgment The High Court has upheld an order by the Home Secretary preventing Maryam Rajavi, a prominent Iranian dissident, from speaking in Parliament. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 5:17 am
Ward LJ also drew support from the Supreme Court’s judgment in ZH (Tanzania) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] UKSC 4. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 10:56 pm
As Baroness Hale said at paragraph 73: It is not statute, but the common law, indeed the rule of law itself, which imposes upon the Secretary of State the duty to comply with his own stated policy, unless he has a good reason to depart from it in the particular case at the particular time. [read post]
15 Dec 2019, 1:30 pm
Teresa Ward v LB Hillingdon. [read post]
20 May 2009, 4:28 pm
The Secretary of State’s submissions were clear as to the result. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 1:25 am
Notes that the Public Law Project will not be making oral submissions, but says these are important submissions. 1200: Michael Fordham QC says the closest case we have is Bobb & Anor v Manning (Trinidad & Tobago) [2006] UKPC 22 (25 April 2006). 11:55: Michael Fordham QC submits it is accepted prerogative power has to be exercised in the public interest. 11:48: Michael Fordham QC queries whether there is some magic for prerogative powers. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 2:48 pm
Particular highlights include: Baroness Hale of Richmond DBE QC, our keynote speaker, who has given a number of significant judgments on housing law cases in the last few years, including Austin v LB Southwark (tolerated trespass); Ali v Birmingham CC (Article 6 and homelessness); Rodriguez v Government of Gibraltar (discrimination in the allocation of housing); Meier v Secretary of State (scope of possession orders); and Pinnock v… [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 2:48 pm
Particular highlights include: Baroness Hale of Richmond DBE QC, our keynote speaker, who has given a number of significant judgments on housing law cases in the last few years, including Austin v LB Southwark (tolerated trespass); Ali v Birmingham CC (Article 6 and homelessness); Rodriguez v Government of Gibraltar (discrimination in the allocation of housing); Meier v Secretary of State (scope of possession orders); and Pinnock v… [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 10:42 am
Substantial State Interest As usual, the court credits the state’s interest in protecting children’s privacy and physical/psychological well-being. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 3:35 am
Although Mr Seal ultimately lost, his claim – and in particular a strong dissenting judgment by Baroness Hale in the House of Lords – highlights the tricky line the state must tread in relation to people with mental health problems in relation to their access to justice. [read post]
24 May 2011, 10:55 pm
The Court held that: Decisions weighing the public interest in deportation against the private interest of the appellant and his family in his private and family life are often difficult and cannot easily be categorised as perverse” [§23] Lord Justice Longmore referred to MA (Somalia) v SSHD [2010] UKSC 49 when the Supreme Court reminded the Court of Appeal that it: should not be astute to characterise as an error of law what is no more than a… [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 4:13 pm
In this case IPSO refused to rule on whether Baroness Tonge had been misrepresented, because she herself did not bring the complaint. [read post]
28 Jul 2009, 9:55 am
From an extended examination of Chadwick LJ’s judgment in Oxley v Hiscock [2004] EWCA Civ 546, which expressly raises ‘fairness’ on the basis of relevant conduct as the criterea by which share of interest should be assessed, in the absence of express agreement, and Stack v Dowden [2007] UKHL 17, which appears to limit ‘fairness’ and expressly concerned shares in a property in joint names, where Oxley v Hiscock concerned a… [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 1:26 am
Baroness Hale in Birmingham CC v Ali [2009] UKHL 36 – a case which, imho, can be made to say what you want it to say – said at [65], “There may come a case in which we should re-examine the circumstances in which a finding of intentional homelessness ceases to colour all future decisions under the Act but there is no need for us to do so now”. [read post]
26 Dec 2008, 1:15 am
As Baroness Hale made it very clear in MacLeod, this is a job for the legislature, not the judiciary.At number three in the top ten comes McCartney v Mills. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 1:00 am
R (Stott) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 18 Jan 2018. [read post]
20 May 2013, 5:23 am
In R (M) v Slough BC [2008] UKHL 52 Baroness Hale held that “care and attention” meant “looking after” someone and “looking after” meant doing something for the person being cared for which he cannot or should not be expected to do for himself.SL had attempted suicide in 2009 after he had become homeless. [read post]
20 May 2013, 5:23 am
In R (M) v Slough BC [2008] UKHL 52 Baroness Hale held that “care and attention” meant “looking after” someone and “looking after” meant doing something for the person being cared for which he cannot or should not be expected to do for himself.SL had attempted suicide in 2009 after he had become homeless. [read post]
