Search for: "State v. Baros"
Results 41 - 60
of 190
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Aug 2019, 10:48 am
To see a contrary finding by the Board, see Baroness Small Estates, Inc. v. [read post]
10 May 2019, 4:48 pm
These cases range from ZH (Tanzania) v SSHD [2011] UKSC 4 (an immigration case) and ETK v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 439 through to PJS v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2016] UKSC 26. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 4:14 pm
” [1.23] If a Secretary of State decides that he wants to silence anti-vaxxers, the right way to go about it is to present a Bill to Parliament, have it debated and, if Parliament agrees, pass it into law. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 8:41 am
” [1.23] If a Secretary of State decides that he wants to silence anti-vaxxers, the right way to go about it is to present a Bill to Parliament, have it debated and, if Parliament agrees, pass it into law. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 8:15 am
As Baroness Hale DPSC said in Aintree University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust v James [2014] AC 591 , para 35: “The authorities are all agreed that the starting point is a strong presumption that it is in a person’s best interests to stay alive. [read post]
3 Mar 2019, 4:51 pm
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 11:09 pm
This was a reference in particular to the infamous front page of the Daily Mail which identified the three judges who decided that the government could not trigger Article 50 (and start the Brexit clock) without the consent of Parliament (R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [2017] UKSC 5 AKA Miller)Hale noted that Miller is not judge made law by any stretch of imagination. [read post]
12 Nov 2018, 4:25 am
Baroness Hale specifically alerted at [35] to the very real problem of discrimination against gay people before stating that this was not happened in the present case. [read post]
7 May 2018, 5:00 am
… Are there concerns that an individual's mental state might exacerbate risk? [read post]
3 May 2018, 4:42 pm
Most authoritatively, the CJEU in L’Oreal v eBay states that a host that has acted non-neutrally in relation to certain data cannot rely on the hosting protection in the case of those data (judgment, para [116]). [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 10:29 am
" Courts in Ireland (Mulvaney v Betfair), the UK (Kaschke v Gray, England and Wales Cricket Board v Tixdaq) and France (TF1 v Dailymotion) have reached similar conclusions (albeit in Tixdaqonly a provisional conclusion). [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 4:13 pm
In this case IPSO refused to rule on whether Baroness Tonge had been misrepresented, because she herself did not bring the complaint. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 1:00 am
R (Stott) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 18 Jan 2018. [read post]
25 Feb 2018, 4:49 pm
In an article concerning the state of journalism in Australia Margaret Simons argues that technological changes are at last being relefected in a shift in attitudes to funding public interest journalism. [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 4:11 pm
The witnesses will include Baroness Warsi, Professor Chris Frost of the NUJ, Sir Alan Moses and Jonathan Heawood. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 4:04 pm
It is well established that this “view” can exist both before and after publication (Campbell v MGN [2003] QB 633). [read post]
19 Nov 2017, 4:09 pm
This was given by Conservative peer, Baroness Warsi. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 2:40 am
Baroness Hale agreed with this. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 9:03 am
The Divisional Court had little difficulty in answering the case stated in the negative. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 2:28 pm
The Secretary of States submissions in Nzolameso, endorsed by Baroness Hale, stressed: that the sending authority must address its mind to, amongst other matters, the need to minimise educational disruption, and must record its reasoning, and be in a position to provide evidence of its contemporary reasoning in court, if called upon to do so. [read post]
