Search for: "State v. Barrett"
Results 81 - 100
of 1,818
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2024, 12:34 pm
New Relists McKesson v. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 2:04 pm
”] [This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman.] [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 10:13 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 8:27 am
We have previously written about both the United States Supreme Court’s 2022 decision in Viking River Cruises, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 7:00 am
Consider, for instance, the end of the Court’s per curiam opinion in Bush v. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 2:16 pm
For example, in Smith v. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 3:10 am
In 2019, in a case called Fort Bend County v. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am
Trump prioritized this argument in his briefs to the Court, drawing primarily on the scholarship of Seth Barrett Tillman and his co-author, Josh Blackman. [read post]
SCOTUS Repeated Relisting of a Case on the Meaning of Race Neutrality--and a Plug for my new Article
19 Feb 2024, 4:00 am
Nevertheless, recognizing the conservative judiciary’s potential hostility to that distinction, the Article practices ideological jujitsu by redeploying Palmer v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 9:30 pm
Barrett on Cardozo's quip (SSRN). [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 3:33 pm
Bose Corp. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 3:05 pm
v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 10:02 am
”] [This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman.] [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:51 am
” The timeframe for decision in Trump v. [read post]
11 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
Case Background The Supreme Court is poised to resolve this circuit split in Macquarie Infrastructure Corporation v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 3:48 pm
There was a tension in yesterday's oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 3:02 pm
“Oral Arguments in Trump v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 1:28 pm
The relevant precedent would be Arizona v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 11:37 am
[This is the second installment in a series about the oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 7:24 am
” As stated by Justice Rehnquist in his concurring opinion in Industrial Union Dept., AFL-CIO v. [read post]