Search for: "State v. Bartee"
Results 1 - 18
of 18
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Apr 2008, 8:12 am
Delaney v. [read post]
25 May 2013, 7:13 pm
Bartee won in State v. [read post]
18 May 2016, 7:12 am
U.S. v. [read post]
14 Dec 2013, 12:22 pm
State v. [read post]
21 Sep 2013, 4:39 pm
Bartee won in State v. [read post]
15 Nov 2006, 6:51 am
[No petition for review filed].Michael Bartee won in State v. [read post]
12 Apr 2014, 7:21 am
Bartee won in State v. [read post]
29 Mar 2014, 10:52 am
Bartee[Rvd/rmd; Beier; Aug. 8, 2014]Whether technical violations of conditional release are violation of sentenceApril 29--Tuesday--a.m.State v. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 3:31 pm
Bartee[Rvd/rmd; Biles; March 21, 2014]Improper alternative means instructionFailure to give unanimity instructionImproper evidence of invocation of right to silenceDisproportionate sentencingState v. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 11:34 am
Very interesting opinion just released—United States v. [read post]
21 Sep 2008, 12:44 am
Bartee, No. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 5:26 am
In both cases, the Sixth found that no prejudice occurred.The Sixth started last Monday, April 7th, with its opinion in United States v. [read post]
24 May 2013, 6:28 pm
Bartee won in State v. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 2:48 am
Hayes v. [read post]
2 Aug 2017, 6:14 am
Bartee, 262 S.W.3d 727 (Tenn. 2008)). [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 9:08 am
Last up is Bufkin v. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 9:47 am
Bartee, No. 07-1526 Denial of habeas corpus relief from a conviction for, inter alia, armed assault with intent to kill is affirmed where, regardless of whether petitioner defaulted on claims due to Massachusetts contemporaneous objection rule or whether the state ruling was contrary to or constituted an unreasonable application of federal law, he was unable to show the indispensable habeas requirement of "prejudice" under Brecht v. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 7:28 am
They are supported by Georgia and 18 other states. [read post]
