Search for: "State v. Bartlett"
Results 241 - 260
of 527
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2016, 1:40 pm
Bartlett v. [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 5:00 am
There’s good language in Bartlett (2013 #+1) [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 3:50 am
At the National Conference of State Legislators’ blog, Lisa Soronen looks at Allen v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 4:29 pm
(Ellington, C.J. and Miller, J. concurring)Bartlett v. [read post]
5 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm
Pirani v. [read post]
12 Oct 2008, 4:00 am
Following the release of orders, the Court will hear argument in: Bartlett v. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 6:22 am
Perhaps most notable are changes made to account for the Second Circuit’s 2018 decision (in United States v. [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 4:30 am
Sullivan v. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 9:55 am
(33) Kansas v. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 4:00 am
Following the release of orders, the Court will hear argument in Bartlett v. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 11:15 am
The Permanent Mission of India to the United NationsDocket: 10-627Issue(s): 1) Whether, in determining whether Congress authorized the Secretary of State ("Secretary") to preempt traditional state taxing powers by designating certain exemptions from state and local property tax laws under The Foreign Missions Act, 22 U.S.C. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 7:52 am
Bartlett Tree Expert Co. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 1:24 pm
Bartlett, 133 S.Ct. 2466 (2013) and Pliva, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 6:01 am
In Wyeth v Levine, the Court pointed out that “Congress did not intend FDA oversight to be the exclusive means of ensuring drug safety and effectiveness’ and that state law serves as a ‘complementary form of drug regulation. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 7:20 am
Bartlett, 43 N.H. 224; Alexander v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 2:36 am
However, even if a plaintiff establishes the first prong, the plaintiff must still demonstrate that he or she would have succeeded on the merits of the action but for the attorney's negligence (see Hamoudeh v Mandel, 62 AD3d 948, 949; McCluskey v Gabor & Gabor, 61 AD3d 646, 648; Peak v Bartlett, Pontiff, Stewart & Rhodes, P.C., 28 AD3d 1028, 1030-31; see also Brodeur v Hayes, 18 AD3d 979; Raphael v Clune, White & Nelson, 201 AD2d… [read post]
31 Dec 2015, 5:12 am
When we first read Bartlett (2013 +1), we were struck by the Court going out of its way to state expressly that the FDA-pre-approval requirement for design changes applied to all prescription drugs. [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 7:40 pm
Ass’n v. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 12:14 am
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
