Search for: "State v. Barts"
Results 121 - 140
of 253
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
New York Appellate Criminal Cases Originating from the New York Supreme Court NY County - LexisNexis
27 Nov 2009, 2:18 pm
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Lewis Bart Stone, ... 10. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 3:40 pm
Mission Bay Alliance, et al. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 8:43 am
" Seago v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 3:07 am
K 487 E3 N48 1998 V.3 The new Palgrave dictionary of economics and the law / edited by Peter Newman. [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 2:44 pm
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Lewis Bart Stone, ... [read post]
12 Nov 2007, 9:04 am
No troll cartoons, unfortunately, but it was fun to watch Hilda talk about the SanDisk v. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 7:57 am
Bay Cities Paving & Grading, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 10:13 am
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Lewis Bart Stone, ... 6. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 2:00 pm
Ever since Bush v. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 2:19 pm
Judgments, Supreme Court, New York County (Lewis Bart Stone, ... [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 10:03 am
Now the Supreme Court has held, in Kleindienst v. [read post]
18 May 2008, 10:03 am
The billboards were first ordered removed in December 2005, when the Indiana Supreme Court ruled that a county ordinance was passed in time, during the administration of then-Mayor Bart Peterson, to prevent Pinnacle Media from erecting the signs. [read post]
23 Feb 2007, 8:33 am
" NFP criminal opinions today (3): Bart Bell v. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 1:25 am
The News Media Association (NMA) and National Union of Journalists issued statements stating that the changes would “weaken the flow of information from police forces to the general public, undermining the public right to know. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 8:55 am
Supreme Court to review the 9th Circuit’s decision in City of Boise v. [read post]
30 Jul 2007, 11:18 am
A weekly (or thereabouts) collection of news about counterfeits, fakes, knockoffs, replicas, imitations, and the culture of copying in general around the globe: Four horsemen: Ralph Lauren sends C&D to PolistasConflict of laws: eBay won't change practices despite German court mandateOriginal Rolex v. eBay court decision (in German)Surrender monkey business: Likelihood of Confusion reportsPen pals: How LVMH prefers to handle fakes on eBay (HT:… [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 10:09 am
In SONY v. [read post]
16 May 2014, 10:01 am
In those emails from the “Frank Cross” email address, defendant attached links to his anonymous blog entries containing Ehrman’s emails, and stated that “Bart” had “put his foot in his mouth again. [read post]
7 May 2009, 6:08 am
As the court stated in McClain:[A]nother methodological problem undermines [the expert's] analogical approach. . . . [read post]
22 Nov 2021, 6:34 am
On 15 November 2021 judgment in Mueen-Udin v Secretary of State for the Home Department was handed down by Nicol J. [read post]
