Search for: "State v. Barts"
Results 141 - 160
of 252
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Oct 2011, 9:53 am
The actions of Bart M. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 3:27 am
Russ.), with introductory note by Bart M.J. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 4:29 pm
Last week, in Firero v. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 4:09 am
Supreme Court Quila & Anor, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] UKSC 45 (12 October 2011) AXA General Insurance Ltd & Ors v Lord Advocate & Ors (Scotland) [2011] UKSC 46 (12 October 2011) Ambrose v Harris, Procurator Fiscal, Oban (Scotland) [2011] UKSC 43 (6 October 2011) Her Majesty’s Advocate v P (Scotland) [2011] UKSC 44 (6 October 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Jones v… [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 5:24 pm
Penal Law § 240.35, which states: "A person is guilty of loitering when he [...] [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 9:00 pm
File a certificate on Form ADV-E (17 CFR 279.8) with the Commission within 120 days of the time chosen by the accountant in paragraph (a)(4) of this section, stating that it has examined the funds and securities and describing the nature and extent of the examination; ii. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 12:08 pm
Congress, and State Governors. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 12:08 pm
Congress, and State Governors. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 12:07 pm
Congress, and State Governors. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 12:07 pm
Congress, and State Governors. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 8:40 am
Congress, and State Governors. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 7:55 am
State v. [read post]
27 Aug 2011, 10:05 am
Near v. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 2:00 pm
(As Harold Feld at Public Knowledge explains, turning off part of the telephone network also violates the Federal Communications Act.)BART claims that it was acting within the scope of a 1969 Supreme Court decision, Brandenburg v. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 10:21 am
Under Youngstown v. [read post]
13 Aug 2011, 8:22 am
(Eugene Volokh) From BART, a San Francisco-area public transportation agency:Organizers planning to disrupt BART service on August 11, 2011 stated they would use mobile devices to coordinate their disruptive activities and communicate about the location and number of BART Police. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 4:08 pm
And BART's justification implies a fear the speech will lead to violence; usually stifling speech for this reason requires meeting the very high test set out in Brandenburg v. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 7:42 pm
In United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 7:09 am
Congress, and State Governors. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 9:15 am
On May 25, 2011, CFTC Commissioner, Bart Chilton, confirmed in a press conference the agency’s vow to hunt down market manipulators by stating, “We’re watching and we’ll come and get you. [read post]
