Search for: "State v. Basile"
Results 1 - 20
of 94
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 May 2024, 7:43 am
Source: USPTO Rothschild moved to dismiss the complaint under the Second Circuit’s Rogers v. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 3:51 am
” (Gallet, Dreyer &Berkey, LLP v Basile, 141 AD3d 405, 406 [1st Dept 2016] [internal quotation marks andcitation omitted].) [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 3:52 am
United States The House of Representatives have passed the Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act, a bill which has been characterised as having the power to ban TikTok. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 5:01 am
Dreyer & Berkey, LLP v Basile, 141 A.D.3d 405 [1st Dept.2016]). [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 7:30 am
Thomas Rodenberg M.D., Basil Mangra M.D. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 6:48 am
State v. [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 2:26 pm
Appellant, v. [read post]
18 Nov 2022, 4:44 am
Besides the question of whether there was continuous representation, Basile v Law Offs. of Neal Brickman, P.C. 2022 NY Slip Op 06079 Decided on November 01, 2022 Appellate Division, First Department considers the question of how the defendant law office handled its move and forwarding of mail. [read post]
17 Aug 2022, 4:50 am
Gallet, Dreyer & Berkey, LLP v Basile, 141 AD3d 405 [2016] [holding summary judgment dismissing [*5]the legal malpractice claim appropriately granted where the asserted damages are vague, unclear, or speculative]; Bellinson Law, LLC v Iannucci, 102 AD3d 563 [1st Dept 2013].) [read post]
13 May 2022, 6:00 am
” Warhol Foundation v. [read post]
9 May 2022, 3:16 am
Basile, 141 AD3d 405 (2016)(holding summary judgment dismissing [*5]the legal malpractice claim appropriately granted where the asserted damages are vague, unclear, or speculative); Bellinson Law, LLC v Iannucci, 102 AD3d 563 (1st Dept 2013)]. [read post]
18 Mar 2022, 12:42 pm
RMJV, LP dba Fresh Creative Foods is recalling numerous food products distributed to 20 states because of pieces of hard clear plastic found during manufacturing. [read post]
28 May 2021, 6:03 am
From Burke v. [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 3:51 am
Not in Drasche v Edelman & Edelman, P.C. [read post]
19 Nov 2020, 2:03 am
See State v. [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 9:58 am
Show notes are located at www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/125 AMC TO TAKE OVER SHUTTERED THEATERS FALL OUT FROM CONSENT DECREES CONTINUES IN APPELLATE RULINGCentury Theater Owner’s Negotiation Tactics Approved.IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONEJERSEY BOYS-NEW STANDARD FOR NON-FICTION CORBELLO V VALLI (USCA, 9th Circuit)TONY BASIL LOSES AGAINST AGENTS DUE TO COPYRIGHT PREEMPTIONCHICK-FIL-A… [read post]
14 May 2020, 7:32 am
Simply put, an “attorney’s conduct or inaction is the proximate cause of a plaintiffs damages if but for the attorney’s negligence the plaintiff. .. would not have sustained actual and ascertainable damages” (Gallet, Dryer & Berkley, LLP v Basile, 141AD3d405 [l st Dept 2016]). [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 4:51 am
“[M]ere speculation of a loss resulting from an attorney’s alleged omissions . . . is insufficient to sustain a claim” for legal malpractice” (Gallet, Dreyer & Berkey, LLP v Basile, 141 AD3d 405, 405-406 [1st Dept 2016] [internal quotation marks omitted]; Geller v Harris, 258 AD2d 421 [1st Dept 1999]). [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 6:39 pm
In this case, the state alleged that our client, Basil E. [read post]
