Search for: "State v. Battle" Results 121 - 140 of 8,191
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jan 2024, 9:13 am by Rose Hughes
A national court, other competent authority in an EPC contracting state, or the UPC may request acceleration of appeal proceedings under Article 10(4) RPBA, without providing a specific reason. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 9:01 am by Just Security
”  South Africa had argued that the imposition of such a requirement would follow the model the Court had used in the provisional measures phase of Ukraine v. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 6:33 am by centerforartlaw
Article 7 urges a signatory state to prohibit the importation of illicitly transferred cultural property from another state while Article 9 allows a state whose cultural property is in jeopardy to request assistance from other states.[4] CPIA allows foreign states to enter into bilateral agreements (or Memorandum of Understanding) with the U.S., which entails an import restriction on cultural property of certain types and from certain periods. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 3:43 am by SHG
According to a statement that Tennessee Coordinator of Elections Mark Goins gave The Tennessean, the state’s Supreme Court “made it clear” in the 2023 case Falls v. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 10:14 am by Eric Goldman
Does Steps Brand Owners Can Take to Deal With Brandjacking on Social Networks Battle Over LinkedIn Account Between Employer and Employee Largely Gutted–Eagle v. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 4:38 am by Beatrice Yahia
“The Iranian-backed Houthi terrorists’ report of an alleged successful attack on M/V Ocean Jazz is patently false,” the U.S. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 5:55 am by Tomaso Falchetta
Indeed, there is a disconnect between the crimes included in the draft treaty (Chapter II) and the scope of application of the powers to investigate crimes and to provide cooperation across jurisdictions (Chapters IV and V). [read post]
21 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
If the battle to root out racial prejudice in capital cases is ever to be won, it will require that we not turn a blind eye to cases like Warren King’s.That case also offers the Court a chance to send a clear message about the seriousness with which it takes violations of its 1986 Batson v. [read post]