Search for: "State v. Beachy" Results 1 - 4 of 4
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Mar 2010, 2:53 am
”Finding that “substantial evidence supports a finding that [Booth’s] injury did not arise out of and in the course of his employment,” the Appellate Division affirmed the Board's determination.In contrast, in Beachy v Regan, 119 AD2d 967, the court ruled that a back injury suffered during practice for an employer-sponsored tug-of-war contest while the employee was “on regular pay” was a work-related for the purposes of eligibility for… [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 4:15 am
"Finding that "substantial evidence supports a finding that [Booth's] injury did not arise out of and in the course of his employment," the Appellate Division affirmed the Board's determination.In contrast, in Beachy v Regan, 119 AD2d 967, the court ruled that a back injury suffered during practice for an employer-sponsored tug-of-war contest while the employee was "on regular pay" was a work-related for the purposes of eligibility for accidental… [read post]