Search for: "State v. Beers"
Results 101 - 120
of 1,292
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 May 2021, 4:00 am
Paul’s Foundation and Shrine of Saint Nicholas the Wonder Worker, Patron of Sailors, Brewers and Repentant Thieves v. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 1:29 pm
Mumm & Cie v. [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 11:46 pm
E.g., Sullivan v. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 5:27 am
State v. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 1:50 am
So the wording of Judge Peter Beer's motion in the Branch Consultants v. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 3:45 am
”However, the Appellate Division ruled that Beers’ complaint contending that the library had violated her civil rights under 42 USC 1983 because it terminated her without a hearing was timely.The question of who is Beers’ employer and whether she was denied her rights to due process will now have to be considered by a state Supreme Court judge.The decision, Beers v Village of Floral Park, 262 AD2d 315 , is posted on the Internet… [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 8:23 am
Moreover, the plaintiffs faced no significant threat of future antitrust harm in the absence of the injunction because, according to their experts, the market had become increasingly competitive and there is no longer any guarantee that the prices De Beers set would hold in the marketplace.The July 13, 2010, decision in Sullivan v. [read post]
22 May 2018, 10:56 am
” Ayyadurai v. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 12:36 pm
On January 28, 2008, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed a federal district court decision that had struck down most of the regulations on the sales of alcoholic beverages imposed by the State of Washington in Costco Wholesale Corp. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 3:00 am
Controulis v. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 3:00 am
Controulis v. [read post]
5 Dec 2009, 9:43 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 12:34 pm
In Great Lakes Bar Control v. [read post]
27 Oct 2015, 4:38 pm
The case, Parent v. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 6:09 am
United States v. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 6:00 am
It certainly does not hurt those opposing the CRAFT BEER ATTORNEY mark that the TTAB stated in this decision, albeit a non-precedential one, that “no amount of evidence can transform a generic phrase into a registrable trademark” citing Miller Brewing Co. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 1:10 pm
Eluding the proper scope of federal jurisdiction: United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2016, 9:05 pm
“Don’t Ground ‘Uber in the Sky'” [Ilya Shapiro and Randal John Meyer on Cato Institute brief in FAA v. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 1:50 pm
State Bd. of Pharmacy v. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 6:04 am
United States v. [read post]
