Search for: "State v. Beets"
Results 1 - 20
of 54
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Mar 2024, 7:29 am
., v. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:43 pm
Introduction: Rebecca Tushnet What might we derive from things the Court has said about trademark of late? [read post]
14 Nov 2023, 8:08 pm
Pursuant to State v. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 8:44 pm
Second, the OTA determined the sole case cited by the FTB in support of its position, Chase Brass & Copper Co., Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 6:38 am
Many trademark attorneys and professors hoped the Supreme Court would provide more guidance on how to resolve conflicts between trademark and free speech rights in Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2022, 10:02 am
In SSMiller IP LLC v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:03 am
Way to deal with specimen laundering, as in LTTB and in Ohio State’s THE. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 4:36 am
Lettuce Turnip the Beet: there just isn’t much nonregistration doctrine to explain why this result is intuitively correct. [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 12:24 pm
ThermoLife Int’l LLC v. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 12:30 pm
FTDA cases do have slightly lower mean frequency v. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 12:31 pm
Blumenthal Distributing, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 2:59 am
” [Institute for Justice “Short Circuit” on Anderson v. [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 9:15 am
ThermoLife Int’l, L.L.C. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 5:02 am
We cite Rumsfeld v. [read post]
5 Aug 2018, 4:28 am
State v. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 1:01 pm
§ 337(a) (“[A]ll such proceedings for the enforcement, or to restrain violations, of [the FDCA] shall be by and in the name of the United States”); see POM Wonderful LLC v. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 1:01 pm
§ 337(a) (“[A]ll such proceedings for the enforcement, or to restrain violations, of [the FDCA] shall be by and in the name of the United States”); see POM Wonderful LLC v. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 10:02 pm
So why is the Ninth Circuit’s opinion in Arizona Dream Act Coalition v. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 8:01 am
Kane v. [read post]
8 May 2013, 8:36 am
So, of course, I had to look up the case, which is Nix v. [read post]
