Search for: "State v. Bently"
Results 1 - 20
of 43
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jan 2013, 3:26 pm
Bently argued strongly it was not), by Article 17 of the Design Directive, Member States retain the right to regulate the breadth of protection afforded to designs by virtue of national copyright laws. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 3:30 pm
Arista v. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 3:05 pm
CIPA acknowledges with gratitude the support of Professor Bently, University of Edinburgh and, in particular, Professor Charlotte Waelde as we revive this idea. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 8:12 am
The action is filed as “United States v. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 10:59 pm
Bently's argument that the focus in eBay v. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 6:00 am
Just one week before, however, we had discussed Rescuecom v Google (...), a case where the United Stated Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit come to the opposite conclusion on the exact same facts. [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 10:29 am
Tanya Aplin & Lionel Bently, Global Mandatory Fair Use, AU Book Talk. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 4:15 am
It would have been interesting to have heard the panellists views on the recenty decision by the CJEU in BestWater International GmbH v. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 10:59 am
| Yet another horse – The Polo/Lauren Company L.P. v Royal County of Berkshire Polo Club Ltd. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 3:02 am
Last week IPKat was also delighted to host a guest post from Professor Lionel Bently (University of Cambridge) on the state of the debate around the proposed EU press publishers’ right: Sleepwalking towards a perpetual (news?) [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 6:38 am
| Yet another horse – The Polo/Lauren Company L.P. v Royal County of Berkshire Polo Club Ltd. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 12:02 pm
The DSM Directive provides a current example of this: its provisions are so complex that in essence the “battlefield” has moved from Strasbourg and Brussels to the Member States that will need to transpose the directive.Sophie then asked the panel a recap of the 3 best and worst contributions by the CJEU.The best 3 contributions of the CJEU according to Eleonora were:The dialogue between the CJEU and the national courts, which at times has been unavoidable (eg where the language… [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 1:48 am
| Yet another horse – The Polo/Lauren Company L.P. v Royal County of Berkshire Polo Club Ltd. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 6:48 am
| Yet another horse – The Polo/Lauren Company L.P. v Royal County of Berkshire Polo Club Ltd. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 2:07 pm
Stone (European Design Law) and Bently, Sherman, Gangjee and Johnson (Intellectual Property Law) accept the view of the Bundesgerichtshof, in spite of potentially severe effects on designers if the legislative scheme is indeed as protectionist as it appears. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 10:02 am
Bently & B. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 1:48 am
In line with Lord Justice Jacob’s point in Actavis v Merck, the Court of Appeal stated that – in certain circumstances – there is nothing inventive about routinely-taken steps even if the actual outcome had not been predicted. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 9:59 pm
"Member States Discuss Key Copyright Issues" is the title of a recent media release from the World Intellectual Property Organization. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 6:01 am
(I’m not sure this is true, as a property teacher who recently taught State v. [read post]
