Search for: "State v. Betts" Results 61 - 80 of 163
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Apr 2013, 8:04 pm by Joy Waltemath
” (Teed v Thomas & Betts Power Solutions, LLC, 7thCir, Case Nos. 12-2440 and 12-3029, March 26, 2013, Posner, R). [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 3:44 am
United States - concerning the Armed Career Criminal Act and state convictions for batteryBloate v. [read post]
30 Sep 2012, 8:33 am
This week the Maryland Court of Special Appeals issued its opinion in Buckley v. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 9:34 am
Betts and Associates would be able to advise you of your legal rights in Georgia. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 10:45 am
[…]” (emphasis added)The Superior Court of Los Angeles County held (BC667011) that, because Feud tried to portray de Havilland as realistically as possible, it was not ‘transformative’ and therefore not eligible for protection under the First Amendment to the US Constitution.The decision was appealed to Court of Appeal of the State of California - Second Appellate District, which yesterday decidedto reverse the lower court’s order [the case is Olivia de… [read post]
19 May 2010, 7:11 am by Anna Christensen
Florida and United States v. [read post]
25 Nov 2017, 6:12 am by Garrett Hinck
Richard Betts and Matthew Waxman outlined a proposal to constrain and safeguard the president’s authority to launch a first-use nuclear attack. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 10:00 am by Rosalind English
In answer to the family rights question, the Court ruled that Article 8 should be considered from the point of view of the family unit as a whole (Beoku-Betts v Secretary of State for the Home Department (2008) UKHL 39, (2009) 1 AC 115). [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 9:55 pm by Suzanne Lambert
The House of Lords has also made clear that it is necessary to consider the impact of deportation on all of the members of the family unit, not just the individual being deported (Beoku-Betts v SSHD [2008] UKHL 39), and that in cases involving children, only rarely should an Article 8 claim be unsuccessful on the basis that it would be more proportionate and more appropriate for that individual to leave and apply for leave from abroad (Chikwamba v SSHD [2008] UKHL 40). [read post]
3 May 2022, 11:54 am by Scott Bomboy
Justice Hugo Black’s unanimous opinion invalidated Betts v. [read post]