Search for: "State v. Betz"
Results 1 - 20
of 65
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 May 2010, 10:49 am
Betz v. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 12:25 pm
The Superior Court of Pennsylvania was recently tasked with determining whether the decision by the state supreme court in Betz v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 11:27 am
Betz v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 11:27 am
Betz v. [read post]
19 Nov 2008, 4:00 pm
As the student post has described, the 9th Circuit recently held in Betz v. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 6:34 am
At issue in Betz v. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 12:17 pm
See Betz v. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 7:24 am
Per Betz v. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 5:16 am
In 2005 in Pennsylvania, plaintiffs in Betz v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 6:36 am
See Betz v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 2:18 pm
There's enough of interest in the North Carolina Court of Appeals' decision this week in GE Betz, Inc. v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 11:05 am
The Betz v. [read post]
5 May 2010, 6:59 am
The case, Betz v. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 4:36 pm
GE Betz, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 4:17 am
“Since the defendants represented the plaintiff’s adversaries in a prior action, the causes of action alleging legal malpractice and negligence are unsupported by any duty running from the defendants to the plaintiff (see Betz v Blatt, 160 AD3d 696, 698 [2018]; Betz v Blatt, 116 AD3d 813, 815 [2014]; Gorbatov v Tsirelman, 155 AD3d 836, 840 [2017]; DeMartino v Golden, 150 AD3d 1200, 1201 [2017]; Pasternack… [read post]
28 Aug 2019, 4:44 am
“Since the defendants represented the plaintiff’s adversaries in a prior action, the causes of action alleging legal malpractice and negligence are unsupported by any duty running from the defendants to the plaintiff (see Betz v Blatt, 160 AD3d 696, 698 [2018]; Betz v Blatt, 116 AD3d 813, 815 [2014]; Gorbatov v Tsirelman, 155 AD3d 836, 840 [2017]; DeMartino v Golden, 150 AD3d 1200, 1201 [2017]; Pasternack… [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 5:30 am
United States v. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 4:20 am
The plaintiff’s conclusory allegation that the defendants intended to deceive the court and the plaintiff in relying on the affirmative defense of release in the claim denial action was not sufficient to state a cause of action alleging a violation of Judiciary Law § 487 (see Betz v Blatt, 160 AD3d at 698; Kupersmith v Winged Foot Golf Club, Inc., 38 AD3d 847, 848). [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 9:16 am
In many respects it follows the Court of Appeals’ rejection of high hourly fees charged by New York lawyers in GE Betz, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 3:55 pm
Br. at 8 (citing State v. [read post]
