Search for: "State v. Bill"
Results 1 - 20
of 19,985
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jan 2025, 10:45 am
Given these unresolved issues, this statute has not yet received a clean bill of health. [read post]
10 Jan 2025, 5:24 am
” In essence, the statute “imposes liability for the making of false statements with scienter” (Bill Birds, Inc. v Stein Law Firm, P.C., 35 NY3d 173, 178 [2020]). [read post]
10 Jan 2025, 4:37 am
Sahil Kapur, Ryan Nobles, Julie Tsirkin, and Frank Thorp V report for NBC News. [read post]
9 Jan 2025, 5:10 pm
The best case to do so is Snope v. [read post]
9 Jan 2025, 2:32 pm
In Bride v. [read post]
9 Jan 2025, 11:10 am
Superior Court Judge Robert McBurney in Judicial Watch v. [read post]
8 Jan 2025, 11:00 pm
State of California, No. [read post]
8 Jan 2025, 9:01 pm
Certain EU member state regulators have raised concerns regarding the updated guidelines. [read post]
8 Jan 2025, 2:02 pm
(Tribal Court Jurisdiction; Allotments) United States v. [read post]
8 Jan 2025, 11:54 am
As one federal appellate court explained in United States v. [read post]
8 Jan 2025, 8:35 am
State of California v. [read post]
8 Jan 2025, 4:14 am
Also contrary to plaintiffs’ contention, the Brooks affidavit did not require the attachment of SZS’s billing statements, as Seibel not only failed to object to the billing statements, but admittedly paid the fees (see Aronson Mayefsky & Sloan, LLP v Praeger, 228 AD3d 182, 185 [1st Dept 2024]). [read post]
7 Jan 2025, 6:35 pm
The other is Ocean State Tactical v. [read post]
6 Jan 2025, 12:31 pm
Does Harris have immunity to prosecution under Trump v. [read post]
6 Jan 2025, 12:13 pm
That’s true even though the legislature previously passed a bill–the AADC–mandating it ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ The AADC is mostly enjoined, in a case also called NetChoice v. [read post]
6 Jan 2025, 5:51 am
An excerpt from Friday's long decision in State v. [read post]
3 Jan 2025, 2:59 pm
That same month, a Florida state representative proposed a bill making it almost impossible to punish people for killing bears, a bill he defended by saying it wasn’t aimed at all bears, just “the ones that are on crack. [read post]
3 Jan 2025, 12:35 pm
New on the Bound By Oath podcast: When a SWAT team blows up an innocent person's house, who should foot the bill for the damage? [read post]
3 Jan 2025, 11:54 am
The Sixth Circuit’s January 2, 2025, decision in Ohio Telecom Association et al. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2025, 9:05 pm
Raimondo and Trump v. [read post]
