Search for: "State v. Birchfield" Results 1 - 20 of 153
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Feb 2023, 12:35 pm by Jacquelyn Greene
The Supreme Court held that warrantless breath tests incident to arrest are permitted under the Fourth Amendment in Birchfield v. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 1:48 pm by Lawrence Taylor
Again, for DUI charges, the state must prove your guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. [read post]
10 Sep 2020, 5:43 pm by admin
Supreme Court decision, Birchfield v. [read post]
District Court for the State of Maine issued an order granting a  motion to suppress evidence in United States of America v. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 6:00 am by Andrew Hamm
Pennsylvania 19-1070Issue: Whether the Supreme Court’s holding that states may not “impose criminal penalties on the refusal to submit to” a warrantless blood draw in Birchfield v. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 6:35 am by Jessica Wildeus
This is because of a 2016 Supreme Court decision which stated that states cannot criminalize the refusal of a blood test (see Birchfield v. [read post]
15 Dec 2019, 6:57 am by Mike Worgul
Supreme Court Case known as Birchfield v North Dakota offered a strong legal precedent that had been used by many people arrested for suspected DUI. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 2:11 am by Michael DelSignore
  The Court further held that a search incident to an arrest cannot justify a warrantless blood draw in the case of  Birchfield v. [read post]
14 Oct 2019, 7:16 am by Patrick@nimblelight.com
In the 2013 case Birchfield v North Dakota, the Supreme Court ruled that warrantless blood tests were a violation of the Fourth Amendment but upheld implied consent laws that require drivers to submit to breathalyzer tests. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 8:13 am by Theodore Harvatin
Recently, the United States Supreme Court held this right to include the right to be free from warrantless blood tests, in Birchfield v. [read post]
Admissibility of Evidence of Refusal to Submit to a Blood Test The court noted that the United States Supreme Court’s ruling in Birchfield v. [read post]