Search for: "State v. Bird" Results 241 - 260 of 1,272
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Dec 2019, 12:00 pm by ernst
Strong v Bird (1874): Reassessing the RuleElizabeth Drummond14. [read post]
27 Nov 2019, 2:00 am by Christopher Tyner
  The NPR story notes that Syed, who was 17 years old at the time of the murder, intends to litigate a Miller v. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 8:50 am by Florian Mueller
The FTC, too, notes that "[s]pecial deference is paid to a trial court's credibility findings," as the Ninth Circuit stated in Exxon Co. v. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 2:05 pm
The techniques used in scientific research are extraordinarily diverse, from counting sheep and watching birds to detecting quasars and creating quarks. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 1:34 am
Early Bird Standard = £510 Early Bird Group Ticket / IBIL Sponsor / UCL alumni = £433.50 Standard fee = £600 Standard Group Ticket / IBIL Sponsor / UCL alumni = £510 More information: here Fashion Law Seminar: Common Law v. [read post]
27 Oct 2019, 5:08 pm by INFORRM
United States Summer Zervos, a former contestant of The Apprentice has presented evidence in court filings to support her claims that the President Trump sexually assaulted her in a hotel room in 2007. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 2:26 am by Peter Groves
In the introduction to his opinion, he comments critically on the state of thelaw. [read post]
13 Oct 2019, 7:20 pm by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
In 2013, the Court struck down the Defense of Marriage Act in United States v. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 3:25 am
Seize the Day – customs & border control was moderated by Manon Rieger-Jansen, Bird & Bird, who set the stage by describing the ubiquitousness of counterfeits in 2019 and the global scope of the problem. [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 5:38 am by Kevin
        Related StoriesUpdate: The Paddlefish Defendants Are Now for SaleUnited States v. 1855.6 Pounds of American Paddlefish MeatCourt: No Tigers in Malibu  [read post]
20 Aug 2019, 12:30 pm by Linda Friedman Ramirez
Judge Rosenbluth noted that without the latter, posting of property alone would have been inadequate.[6] The Court cited Wright v Henkel for the proposition that pretrial release in foreign extradition cases is generally not appropriate.[7] However, Wright v Henkel is also known for having created the judicial concept of “special circumstances. [read post]