Search for: "State v. Bitting" Results 21 - 40 of 9,815
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 May 2010, 2:02 pm by Kent Scheidegger
Here is a bit more explanation of the odd case of Robertson v. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 6:22 am
The Court found Congress's purpose in enacting the NSPA was to `assist the States' efforts to foil the “roving criminal,” whose movement across state lines. [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 9:07 pm by Juvan Bonni
Narechania: State Immunity and the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (Source: SSRN) New Job Postings on Patently-O: Weaver Austin Villeneuve & Sampson LLP Stoel Rives LLP Caldwell Intellectual Property Law Daly, Crowley, Mofford & Durkee, LLP Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP Boehringer Ingelheim Blackbird Technologies Knobbe Martens [read post]
14 Mar 2019, 1:54 pm
 There was a bit of legal maneuvering this afternoon in courtroom 4-1 in the trial of officer Aledda charged with attempted manslaughter in the firing of his weapon at an autistic young man. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 11:09 am by Corey Rayburn Yung
For essentially the reasons explained by the Court of Appeals, see United States v. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 10:16 am by Brandon D'Agostino
Traditionally, cases that mentioned full forensic imaging of hard drives began their captions with United States v. or State v. because they were criminal matters. [read post]
10 Feb 2024, 3:23 pm by Eric Goldman
” If the forthcoming Supreme Court opinion gives even the tiniest bit of validity to claims that Internet services are state actors, the winners will be anti-LGBTQ haters and other anti-social actors seeking to force services to carry their anti-social content. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 4:06 am by Carissa Byrne Hessick
But I was interested in the presumption because it forms the basis of a few cases that I find troubling --- most notably, the Supreme Court’s ruling in United States v. [read post]