Search for: "State v. Bivens"
Results 21 - 40
of 528
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jul 2012, 7:56 pm
United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 6:42 pm
Boule narrowed, but did not eliminate, private civil damages actions for constitutional violations by federal officials under Bivens v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 5:40 am
A member of the panel then states that, in her opinion, a Bivens cause of action does not require congressional action, and that the government’s argument relies on United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 12:06 pm
See Bivens v. [read post]
26 Jul 2009, 11:17 pm
In Bivens v. [read post]
28 Jan 2012, 7:43 am
The Fourth Circuit’s decision here leans heavily on two Supreme Court precedents involving Bivens and the military context, United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 5:54 am
Shortly after Section 233(a) was enacted, the Supreme Court issued its opinion in Bivens v. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 6:09 am
As Wikipedia explains, in Bivens v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 10:23 am
Over at the ACSblog, I have a guest post up on Al-Aulaqi v. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 7:55 am
The Court also spent significant time trying to figure out if Himmelreich’s Section 2680 argument runs contrary to the result in United States v. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 4:44 am
I’m writing to expand a bit on the current state of Bivens and how it will likely play out in the drone strikes suit. [read post]
3 Nov 2021, 10:26 am
The district court dismissed the claims against Egbert, noting that causes of action under Bivens v. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 5:39 pm
Now, an argument about congressional activity ratifying Bivens arguably does not fully address the point made by then Justice Rehnquist in his dissent in Carlson v. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 9:05 pm
In Bivens v. [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 11:09 am
The following exchange occurred toward the end of Petitioner's argument: Justice Alito asked whether a plaintiff would have a § 1983 action if the shooter had been a state or local police officer; petitioner's attorney responded "You would not have a claim over the State officer, but if you don't --but a Bivens claim--a constitutional Bivens claim could apply to the State officer. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 6:54 am
It does so again in this case.The case is Egbert v. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 6:39 am
This term comes from the 1971 cased entitled Bivens v. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 3:11 am
That was the 6-3 decision in Bivens v. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 3:02 pm
Hernández v. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 4:48 am
Bivens v. [read post]
