Search for: "State v. Bivens" Results 41 - 60 of 528
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2007, 4:29 am
The United States Supreme Court decided yesterday a malicious prosecution/RICO case with a Fourth and Fifth Amendment implication yesterday: Wilkie v. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 3:53 am by SHG
The basis for the complaint in this case was Bivens v. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 12:40 pm by admin
Pollard pursued his claims under the authority of the 1971 Supreme Court case Bivens v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 6:50 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
If you want to sue state officials or state employees for constitutional violations, you can do so under 42 U.S.C. section 1983. [read post]
16 May 2011, 10:24 am by Lyle Denniston
The basic decision at issue is the Justices’ ruling in 1971, in Bivens v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 1:24 pm by Larkin Reynolds
As Jack and Steve have both noted, yesterday the Fourth Circuit issued its opinion in Lebron v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 11:30 am by Alex Loomis
They sought damages for violations of their Fourth and Fifth Amendment rights under Bivens v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 11:30 am by Alex Loomis
They sought damages for violations of their Fourth and Fifth Amendment rights under Bivens v. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 11:24 am by Lyle Denniston
  Thus, there does not seem to be an expansion of Bivens v. [read post]
6 May 2012, 6:32 pm by Dwight Sullivan
Here’s an order from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California allowing other aspects of the Martin v. [read post]
21 Aug 2010, 7:06 am
The pleading requirements for a Fourth Amendment violation in a Bivens or § 1983 claim: Yopp v. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 8:26 am by The Federalist Society
Supreme Court directed the parties to address whether Hernandez’s parents could even raise their claims under Bivens v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 12:05 pm by Steve Vladeck
Jack just flagged the Fourth Circuit’s unanimous 39-page opinion throwing out Lebron v. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 11:23 am by Andrew Kent
But the Court’s 2008 decision in Boumediene v. [read post]