Search for: "State v. Blight"
Results 1 - 20
of 369
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Feb 2024, 1:15 pm
Martin v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am
Lash's response to the Amar brothers' amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 9:30 pm
(Infodocket) ICYMI, Trump v. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 12:30 pm
Under the Supreme Court's ruling in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 9:23 am
" In Regan v. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 12:30 pm
Friends, we are excited to share that the Supreme Court has just taken up Gonzalez v. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 12:32 pm
Joyce & Wicked Willow Press, LLC v. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 4:03 am
From Tucson v. [read post]
11 Jun 2023, 3:37 am
’” Huntley Power v Town of Tonawanda, 2023 WL 3912499 (NYAD 4 Dept.2023) [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 8:25 am
In the 1916 case of Butler v. [read post]
29 May 2023, 5:01 am
Joyce v. [read post]
25 May 2023, 11:00 pm
In simple terms, the government cannot take your land and then decide later what to do with it without running afoul of the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution, as applied to the states by the Fourteenth Amendment.Absent “urban blight,” or other exceptions which weren’t present here, the AD4 annulled the Town’s efforts to acquire the Mall property and awarded the owner its fees and costs.Not that’s a… [read post]
10 May 2023, 6:02 am
As Tocqueville observed long before Ken Paxton and his ilk blighted the federal courts, "[s]carcely any political question arises in the United States that is not resolved, sooner or later, into a judicial question. [read post]
4 May 2023, 9:51 pm
Kelo was an important decision that drew a massive political backlash (over 80% of the public opposed the ruling, and 45 states enacted eminent domain reform laws in reaction to it) and remains contentious to this day. [read post]
26 Mar 2023, 1:47 pm
The Idaho Supreme Court, for example, stated in Bartosz v. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 10:24 am
Make UC a Good Neighbor v. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 12:51 pm
Davies v Bridgend County Borough Council (2023) EWCA Civ 80 – the Court of Appeal on residual diminution in value/blight in nuisance cases (here Japanese knotweed) – it is not ‘pure economic loss, and is recoverable in damages. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 9:53 am
, Lucas v. [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 9:18 pm
Parker (1954) and Kelo v. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 1:11 am
In the final chapter, May looks into the benefits of PDOs for different groups of stakeholders: producers, consumers, regional and state authorities. [read post]
