Search for: "State v. Blizzard"
Results 41 - 60
of 263
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2023, 2:13 pm
The FTC and DOJ's guiding principle these days--including this month's new United States et al. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 12:59 am
By coincidence, that was the day the United States Department of Justice and eight state AGs filed a second Unite States et al. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 9:23 pm
Its in-house adjudicative proceeding does not prevent the merger from closing.This is the order on the motion to stay and the next deadlines and hearing dates:DeMartini et al. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 2:20 am
First, the document:DeMartini et al. v. [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 12:22 pm
Judge Corley has just granted the latter:DeMartini et al. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 1:54 pm
While FTC v. [read post]
7 Jan 2023, 10:23 pm
This "gamers' lawsuit" against Microsoft-ActivisionBlizzard (DeMartini et al v. [read post]
22 Dec 2022, 11:01 pm
Its in-house adjudicative proceedings are somewhat controversial, and the Supreme Court is now working on its Axon Enterprise, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2022, 11:22 pm
Activision Blizzard is mostly in the Central--not Northern--District of California. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 3:10 am
The FTC does not state any objective criterion for the alleged difference in performance. [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 1:58 pm
Class V stock was a publicly traded “tracking stock” that tracked the performance of VMware, Inc. [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 12:12 pm
Spencer's stated strategic priority regardless of the fact that the recent launch of CoD Modern Warfare II has been wildly successful. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 9:18 am
First, legislative measures like the DMA, regulatory intervention such as the ongoing DG COMP investigation of the Google Play Store, and litigation (in less than a week, the Ninth Circuit will hear Epic v. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 5:40 am
" Tellingly, Google itself cited foreign decision in its submission, and the CCI specifically names last year's Epic Games v. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 4:28 pm
” Blizzard Ent., Inc. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 8:25 am
That day is going to be (at least) doubly eventful from a FOSS Patents perspective as the Mannheim Regional Court will hold the first Ericsson v. [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 9:11 pm
So if Google wants to sit down with Activision Blizzard and others and ask some more questions about Project Hug, I can understand that desire, even though it would cause delay and the court would have to amend the case schedule.Affinity Credit Union v. [read post]
19 Oct 2022, 4:28 am
The Epic v. [read post]
12 Oct 2022, 5:44 am
That is a fact, and it was also mentioned during last year's Epic Games v. [read post]
8 Oct 2022, 2:30 am
That's when the Epic Games v. [read post]
