Search for: "State v. Blizzard" Results 61 - 80 of 263
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Oct 2022, 12:51 am by Florian Mueller
There are three paragraphs that stress the "central objective of CADE's efforts" ("o objetivo central da atuação do Cade"), which is that of every competition authority in the civilized world: to protect, in the interest of consumer welfare, the competitive process ("concorrência") (as the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit also emphasized in its FTC v. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 8:27 am by Dennis Crouch
Activision Blizzard Inc., No. 21-1554 SawStop Holding LLC v. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 4:49 am by Dennis Crouch
  The specification expressly states that “an effective dose … can be from … about 480 mg to about 720 mg per day. [read post]
  Updated draft guidelines have not been released by the agencies, but the agencies have stated a goal of releasing new guidelines by the end of this year. [read post]
4 May 2022, 3:37 pm
  That section stated that disputes under the license agreement would be resolved in accordance with Blizzard’s dispute resolution policy, to which the section connected via hyperlink. [read post]
3 May 2022, 9:03 pm by Dan Flynn
” “Notice of Interlocutory Appeal” “Notice of Premises of Penhallow v. [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 1:57 am by Florian Mueller
In one of the most important antitrust cases in the history of our industry, the Google Android case (one of several pending Google v. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 2:01 pm by John Elwood
Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit reversed in relevant part, rejecting the states’ nondelegation challenge; the court also concluded other claims were time-barred because the states acted more than a decade after CMS promulgated the rule. [read post]
3 Jan 2022, 12:39 pm by Kevin LaCroix
(Please note that these figures reflect only federal court securities class action lawsuit filings; the filing numbers do not include state court securities class action lawsuit filings during the year.) [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 8:54 am by Mark MacCarthy
The Safe Tech Act responds, among other things, to the Herrick v. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 4:06 am by rainey Reitman
(Pamela Samuelson’s Commentary on UMG v Augusto and Vernor v Autodesk) Vernor v Autodesk (EFF Amicus Brief in Key Case re First Sale and Contracts, Following UMG v Augusto) MDY v Blizzard (Justia) A Mixed Ninth Circuit Ruling in MDY v Blizzard: WoW Buyers Are Not Owners – But Glider Users Are not Copyright Infringers (EFF’s Commentary on MDY v Blizzard) Capitol Records v ReDigi… [read post]