Search for: "State v. Blizzard"
Results 81 - 100
of 263
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jul 2012, 6:16 am
Blizzard, 521 F.Supp.2d 1140, 1152 (E.D.Wash.2007). [read post]
15 May 2017, 10:28 am
" United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 3:10 am
The FTC does not state any objective criterion for the alleged difference in performance. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 1:24 am
First, FTC v. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 1:57 pm
The United States Supreme Court heard oral argument today on the case of Endrew F v Douglas County Sch Dist, #RE-1, Case No. 15-827. [read post]
25 Sep 2020, 12:37 am
Of the three key decisions that were scheduled for today, the least important one (a Nokia v. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 7:34 am
Activision Blizzard, Inc., No. 14-cv-02361 (N.D. [read post]
6 Oct 2022, 12:51 am
There are three paragraphs that stress the "central objective of CADE's efforts" ("o objetivo central da atuação do Cade"), which is that of every competition authority in the civilized world: to protect, in the interest of consumer welfare, the competitive process ("concorrência") (as the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit also emphasized in its FTC v. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 7:18 am
See Acceleration Bay LLC. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 1:54 pm
While FTC v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 10:41 am
Yesterday's closing argument in Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 1:22 pm
Here the District Court–– citing the well-known AT&T acquisition of TimeWarner in 2018 (See United States v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 9:23 am
On April 29, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court decided a fairly typical state postconviction capital case in Commonwealth v. [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 6:25 am
Right before the midnight Pacific Time deadline, Microsoft and Activision Blizzard filed their (joint) opposition to the Federal Trade Commission's motion for a preliminary injunction: Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 2:13 pm
The FTC and DOJ's guiding principle these days--including this month's new United States et al. v. [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 2:57 am
For example, if all breach of licences are to be treated as copyright infringement, we may end up with decisions that retroactively apply such infringement, such as the recent Blizzard v MDY.Nevertheless, this is a ruling that will boost the enforceability of all types of licences, not only open ones. [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 8:40 am
”) In re Activision Blizzard, Inc. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 12:39 pm
[4] Bell v. [read post]
7 Jan 2023, 10:23 pm
This "gamers' lawsuit" against Microsoft-ActivisionBlizzard (DeMartini et al v. [read post]
7 May 2012, 11:59 am
In K-Beech, Inc. v. [read post]
