Search for: "State v. Blood"
Results 81 - 100
of 5,012
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Nov 2009, 9:32 am
In People v Lerow (_ AD3d __, 2009 NY Slip Op 08648 [4th Dept 12/20/09]) the Fourth Department decided an apparent issue of first impression for a New York appellate court: Can a New York police officer lawfully to direct the withdrawal of blood from a suspect who is physically located outside of the state, where the supsect had been involved in a vehicular accident in New York State and transferred to another state (in this case Pennsylvania. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 9:01 pm
State v. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 11:10 am
The following year the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals in State v. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 2:46 pm
The decision, State v. [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 1:54 pm
State v. [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 9:00 pm
Johnson (2008), United States v. [read post]
27 Oct 2018, 8:04 am
The Supreme Court of the United State’s ruling in Birchfield v. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 7:33 am
Today, the Supreme Judicial Court (SJC) hears oral argument in Commonwealth v. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 5:04 pm
See, Missouri v. [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 10:59 am
Additional Resources: Birchfield v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 9:11 pm
State v. [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 12:33 pm
IN THE NEWS: AP: Court Weighs Warrantless Blood Searches Learn more about Missouri v. [read post]
24 May 2013, 8:32 am
With the United States Supreme Court ruling in Missouri v. [read post]
29 May 2018, 10:12 am
The officer stated that following the warning, Evans consented to the test. [read post]
20 Apr 2013, 1:39 pm
The trial judge suppressed the blood test, and the case was appealed through the Missouri state courts to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 1:39 pm
State v. [read post]
24 May 2013, 8:32 am
With the United States Supreme Court ruling in Missouri v. [read post]
24 May 2012, 11:13 am
See Segura v. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 9:27 am
The New Jersey Appellate Division cited that decision earlier this year in State v. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 3:19 pm
As seen in State v. [read post]
