Search for: "State v. Board"
Results 121 - 140
of 27,938
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2019, 8:42 am
Schwinn, John Marshall Law School The Supreme Court ruled today in Franchise Tax Board v. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 3:04 am
State Mortuary And Cemetery Board (A136781)Judge Landau: "... [read post]
23 Nov 2017, 3:44 am
Perhaps surprisingly, the Court unequivocally departs from its decision in R (Kaiyam) v Secretary of State for Justice [2014] UKSC 66 (decided less than three years earlier) to endorse the narrower understanding of the obligation set down by the ECtHR in James v UK (App no. 25119/09). [read post]
11 May 2007, 2:38 am
R (Johnson) v. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 11:01 pm
Ltd. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 12:28 pm
See United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 11:51 am
That is what happened in North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 1:37 pm
Supreme Court concluded in North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 7:07 am
" State v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 10:03 am
Finally, the Board says that the Secretary of State for Justice should be made a party to proceedings like the present (because the Secretary of State is the other party before the Board) and so one answer would be for the Secretary of State to be made liable for the costs. [read post]
19 May 2022, 9:01 pm
On May 13, 2022, a judge of the Los Angeles County Superior Court ruled in Crest v. [read post]
31 Aug 2018, 6:23 am
On November 4, 2015, the Washington County Board of Zoning Appeals (“the Board”) granted the application. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 6:43 pm
Supreme Court held in North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 3:52 pm
It at first seemed a little harsh to me that the California State Board of Pharmacy revoked Andrew Sternberg's pharmacy license just because he was the pharmacist in charge when someone else stole some drugs from the office. [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 9:05 am
State Personnel Board (1/7/13) --- Cal.App.4th --- is another decision dealing with the essential functions of a police officer. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 11:27 pm
United States (sustaining independent regulatory commissions) and Morrison v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 7:44 am
An article about the state of the Benefits Review Board has been published at LexisNexis’ Workers’ Compensation Law Community page. [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 7:55 am
New York State Board of Elections? [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 4:00 am
In Drummond v. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 1:42 am
In addressing the very nature of human rights law, Lord Reed called with approval upon the words of Lord Cooke in R (Daly) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2001] 2 AC 532: “The truth is, I think, that some rights are inherent and fundamental to democratic civilised society. [read post]
