Search for: "State v. Board of Control" Results 81 - 100 of 6,701
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
By Jared Klaus and Allen Carter State bar associations and other licensing boards were left like bleeding seals in shark-infested waters following the United States Supreme Court’s landmark decision this February in North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 11:11 am by Josh Blackman
And in turn, the unsurprising effect of such a judgment may be to send state legislators back to the drawing board. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 10:01 am
Today, I’ll talk about the details of North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 2:38 pm by Ronald Meisburg
The court disagreed, stating its analysis by stating that “Section 9(c)(5) appears to have been added to prevent the Board from . . . [read post]
11 May 2015, 6:54 am by MBettman
On May 19, 2015, the Supreme Court of Ohio will hear oral argument in the case of Board of Health of Cuyahoga County v. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 5:39 am by Brian Craig
Brian CraigThe Board’s inter partes review decision declaring unpatentable a system that monitors and controls remote devices was reversed. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 12:59 pm by Howard Friedman
The Mosque, at the instigation of the first board, filed suit in a state trial court seeking a temporary restraining order to require the second board to declare that it had no authority to control or direct the affairs of the Mosque. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 3:25 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
State of Ohio Controlling Board, joined by Justices Pfeifer and O’Neill. [read post]
18 May 2018, 6:05 am by John Jascob
Further, the court stated, precedent supports a controller’s right to preemptively protect a control interest (CBS Corporation v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 10:48 am by Hope Lewis - Guest
The Ninth Circuit’s decision in United States v. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 4:28 am by INFORRM
In Reklos v Greece ([2009] ECHR 200). the Court stated that while the right to control the use of one’s image generally involves the possibility of refusing publication, “it also covers the individual’s right to object to the recording, conservation and reproduction” of that image. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 3:06 am
The Board ruled that the marks in a family of marks may be owned by different entities if there is "unity of control," but because opposer failed to plead unity of control the Board dismissed the opposition. [read post]