Search for: "State v. Booker"
Results 281 - 300
of 1,083
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2012, 4:31 pm
As required by United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 10:24 am
There being nothing of particular interest issued in the last couple of days [okay, so I'm about a week late with this] we are going to reach back to a case from January, United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 2:35 pm
United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2012, 4:41 pm
Justice Breyer, who dissented in Apprendi, opposed the extension of that rule to the Federal Sentencing Guidelines in United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 1:11 pm
For example, the first search result of “author:Scalia” was United States v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 7:49 pm
The state Supreme Court upheld the sentence, concluding that the Supreme Court’s more recent decision in Graham v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 4:22 am
Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005). [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 7:54 pm
The petition of the day is: Gabayzadeh v. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 8:51 am
Booker, Cunningham v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 7:12 pm
In Roper v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 11:00 pm
His Honour Judge Bellamy’s criticism at paragraph 193 of L (A Child: Media Reporting), Re [2011] EWHC B8 (Fam) of The Daily Telegraph’s Christopher Booker’s reporting of the case as “unbalanced, inaccurate and just plain wrong”, a criticism supported by Sir Nicholas Wall in X, Y, and Z & Anor v A Local Authority[2011] EWHC 1157 (Fam) at paragraph 102. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 8:49 am
Booker. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 10:11 am
In Booker-El v. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 2:43 pm
v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 3:39 am
Bolton (which we’ll talk about on Thursday), and the other in State v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 1:19 pm
Sotomayor joined one and indicated strongly that she would likely favor the other, but she didn’t need to reach that; doing would have required a United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2012, 7:21 am
State v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 2:23 pm
Until the recent Ninth Circuit decision in United States v. [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 9:03 am
United States v. [read post]