Search for: "State v. Boone"
Results 41 - 60
of 481
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Aug 2021, 1:36 am
Nunes v. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 3:15 pm
From Mashaud v. [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 9:05 pm
In HollyFrontier Cheyenne Refining, LLC v. [read post]
27 Jul 2021, 8:59 am
The 2013 NDAA amended the Small Business Act, a series of statutes set forth in Part 15 of the United States Code. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 9:52 am
Judges Inman and Griffin concurred. (1) Victim’s statements regarding identity of attacker were admissible as excited utterances despite possible passage of time between attack and statements; (2) Sixth Amendment confrontation argument not raised during trial was waived on appeal notwithstanding pretrial motion; (3) No abuse of discretion or prejudicial error in admission of testimony identifying defendant on a jail phone call and interpreting the contents of the call State… [read post]
7 May 2021, 5:03 am
Such a statute would be a boon for democracy around the world. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 5:47 am
In Van Der Boon NO v Moletsane[1] (“The Moletsane Case”), the court held that, where a purchaser has bought a vehicle and continues to use that vehicle after discovering and reporting the defects to the seller; a purchaser does not lose the right to bring an action under actio redhibitoria. [read post]
10 Mar 2021, 2:00 am
Supreme Court’s decision in Mach Mining, LLC v. [read post]
10 Mar 2021, 2:00 am
Supreme Court’s decision in Mach Mining, LLC v. [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 2:23 pm
A version of this article previously was published as a Haynes and Boone client alert. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 3:50 am
“The court declines to dismiss plaintiffs cause of action for legal malpractice pursuant to CPLR § 321 l(a)(l), on the basis of plaintiffs llocution under oath, because New York State courts have not taken a consistent position on whether an allocution that a client was satisfied with the services of his/her attorney precludes a client from bringing a claim for legal malpractice (See Boone v. [read post]
Guest Post: Halliburton II Price Impact Defenses Can Limit Severity on Deficient Exchange Act Claims
12 Jan 2021, 2:19 pm
Rather, the real winner is a growing cohort of lawyers who are filing meritless lawsuits in federal and state courts across the United States every time a merger or acquisition is announced or a corporate misfortune impacts a company’s share price… In the last five years, half of the nearly $23 billion in securities claims costs have gone to lawyers — both plaintiff and defense.[4] Since 2017, the plaintiffs’ bar has expanded their corporate fraud… [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 7:49 am
That’s a boon to those who won’t need bankruptcy. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 9:05 pm
In the case of Janus v. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 12:33 am
George Bermann (Columbia Law, New York, USA); on panel three: Melanie Willems (Haynes Boone, London, U.K.) and Prof. [read post]
25 Sep 2020, 12:57 pm
Filed in 1974, US v. [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 6:18 am
Introduction In 1998, Bill Clinton signed the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA), a sweeping overhaul of U.S. copyright law notionally designed to update the system for the digital era. [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 4:30 pm
From Jennifer B. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 5:24 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 7:15 am
Williams, Hassell v. [read post]
