Search for: "State v. Boroff"
Results 1 - 8
of 8
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jan 2013, 1:47 pm
Ohio July 30, 2012); Boroff v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 4:26 am
The case is Claudio v. [read post]
27 Feb 2010, 12:16 pm
., Case No. 09-11960-JNF) (Feeney, J.) contradicted the strict construction ruling of the state’s intermediary appellate court’s 1995 Spinelli decision and instead applied the later, liberal construction policy of the state supreme court’s 1996 Dwyer v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 1:18 pm
See Boroff v. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 1:15 pm
Indeed, in Boroff v. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 9:46 am
In this case, the bankruptcy court relied on the reasoning in Boroff v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 2:47 pm
Microsoft Corp., 309 F.3d 193, 202 (4th Cir. 2002) (“allegations must be stated in terms that are neither vague nor conclusory’”); Browning v. [read post]
22 Oct 2023, 11:03 pm
Under the UCC, as a general rule, all types of goods held on consignment (not just art) are subject to claims of the consignee-dealer’s creditors while in the consignee’s possession unless the consignor has complied with the UCC’s requirements of publicly filing a notice stating that the consignor holds a security interest in the consigned work of art. [read post]
