Search for: "State v. Borough" Results 1 - 20 of 973
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Oct 2018, 4:10 am by Howard Friedman
KBBI News reports that an Alaska state trial court judge yesterday in Hunt v. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 2:51 am by Jonathan Glasson QC, Matrix.
The post Case Comment:Torfaen County Borough Council v Douglas Willis Ltd [2013] UKSC 59 appeared first on UKSC blog. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 1:47 am by Tom Pritchard
Summary On 23 June 2016 the Supreme Court will hear the appeal of Manolete Partners plc v Hastings Borough Council. [read post]
  Williams v The London Borough of Hackney [2018] UKSC 37 was about the opposite scenario; where a local authority wanted to accommodate but the parents wanted the children back. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 12:00 am by Darryl Hutcheon, Matrix
This week, the Supreme Court hears the appeal in Hotak v London Borough of Southwark, which is joined with the appeals in Johnson v Solihull and Kanu v Southwark. [read post]
20 May 2015, 3:11 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Upon considering the rule in Din v Wandsworth London Borough Council [1983] 1 AC 657, Lord Reed reasoned that the review officer did not consider whether the cause of the appellant’s current state of homelessness was her surrender of her tenancy at the hostel. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 2:28 pm by Giles Peaker
E, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Islington [2017] EWHC 1440 (Admin) E is a nine year old child, who brought the claim through her mother, C. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 12:22 am
The next round of the battle between the State and those who build houses in breach of planning controls is scheduled to be heard in the case of Welwyn Hatfield Council v the Secretary of State in the Supreme Court on 7 February 2011. [read post]
14 May 2015, 1:59 am by Justin Bates, Arden Chambers
In Mohammed v Manek and Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea (1995) 27 HLR 439, it was held that, as a general rule, accommodation made available for an applicant pending enquiries as to what (if any) duty was owed to him under Pt 7, Housing Act 1996, was not within the scope of s 3, so that an authority do not have to obtain a possession order before evicting an applicant. [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
 A consent decree was entered this week in United States v. [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 12:39 pm by Bill Ward
(Slip opinion, p. 14) Download the per curiam opinion in Klumpp v. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 7:08 am by Blog Editorial
The Supreme Court has refused permission for either Haringey Borough Council or the Secretary of State to appeal against the Court of Appeal’s decision in Shoesmith v OFSTED & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 642. [read post]