Search for: "State v. Boshers" Results 1 - 20 of 32
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Oct 2019, 11:15 am
Norris catching up on IPKat after some hard partyingphoto credit: https://www.learningliftoff.comPatentWhen Shakespeare wrote "something is rotten in the state of Denmark," he might have very well been describing the Danish court system in 2019. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 2:04 am by Giorgio Luceri
GuestKat Tian Lu discussed background of the case and provided a comment on the outcome of the decision and the assessment of deceptiveness of marks in light with the Trade Mark Law of China (TMLC) (see here).GuestKat Hayleigh Bosher reported on the case of the company Fizzy Foam, a trade mark owner that surrendered some of its registered marks, even though they were accepted by the UKIPO after receiving reactions on the Internet and a petition against their registrations… [read post]
27 Sep 2020, 7:08 am by Anastasiia Kyrylenko
Hayleigh Bosher briefly summarized the main points of the questionnaire, adding her reflections on some of the questions asked by the UK IPO. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 6:17 am
The contested patents involve a compound patent owned by Gilead and a second medical use patent owned by the government of the United States. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 9:52 pm by Jocelyn Bosse
The report, authored by Hayleigh Bosher, highlighted the emerging trend in the use of social media to generate strategic “backlash” against enforcement of IP rights, as well as harnessing the so-called 'David vs. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 6:25 am by Sophie Corke
Murphy, Austrian Supreme Court revisits football screening in pubs | Dutch State not liable for incorrect interpretation of private copying exception, says Hague Court of Appeal | West African Cotton Company Limited v Hozelock Exel: How may a petitioner establish lack of novelty of a registered design in Nigeria? [read post]
15 May 2019, 10:06 pm
Trade marksHayleigh Bosher discusses the trade marks adventure of Zara. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 6:03 am
Hayleigh Bosher reports and comments in Gigi Hadid Instagram copyright infringement case dismissed in the case Xclusive v. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 9:19 am by Anastasiia Kyrylenko
To which extent may state authorities (in this case, the State of North Carolina) act as copyright pirates? [read post]
9 Feb 2019, 2:13 am
", considers the interaction between the specific jurisdictional rules regarding claims involving EU unitary IP rights and the jurisdictional rules under the Brussels regulation in light of the CJEU decisions in case C-617/15 (Hummel v Nike) and joined Cases C-24/16 and C-25/16 (Nintendo v BigBen Interactive) and the subsequent English court’s decision in Poul Chang Metal Industry Company Ltd v Bailcast Ltd and Anor.Book ReviewsSpecialKat Hayleigh… [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 9:04 am
| Beware of your old expert reports, as Henry Carr J allows hearsay expert evidence in Illumina v Ariosa | Still want to be a UPC judge? [read post]
4 May 2019, 6:15 am
SpecialKat Hayleigh Bosher analyses the decision of the fifth chamber of the Court of Justice of the European Union (Case T‑215/17) regarding figurative trade marks representing fruits.Hans Eriksson provides a report on a Swedish decision regarding black-and-white representation of signs.PatentsIn Your FRANDly Update: Ericsson v HTC, FRAND in India, jurisdictional issues (again), Unwired Planet v Huawei, ASUS v Interdigital and more, AmeriKat Annsley Merelle… [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 3:02 am
Last week IPKat was also delighted to host a guest post from Professor Lionel Bently (University of Cambridge) on the state of the debate around the proposed EU press publishers’ right: Sleepwalking towards a perpetual (news?) [read post]
30 Jan 2022, 7:12 am by Giorgio Luceri
Here they are in case you missed them:TRADE MARKSKatfriend Marijus Dingilevskis posted on a recent decision of the Lithuanian Supreme Court, which states that even if a trade mark has been registered in the international register for 40 years, this is no guarantee that a subsequent national designation will be also registered.GuestKat Becky Knott commented on the decision of the 2nd Board of Appeal in case R 609/2021-2 [Volkswagen… [read post]
7 Apr 2020, 9:30 am by Sophie Corke
States Have Sovereign Immunity from Copyright Damages | [Guest post] ‘Upload filters’ and human rights: implementing Article 17 of the Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market | Stairway to Heaven: The impact of Zeppelin on Katy Perry's copyright infringement case - overturned | China says ‘No’ to the malicious filing of Coronavirus-related trade marks | Does the requirement for a "technical contribution" in a novel… [read post]
20 Dec 2020, 11:02 am by Anastasiia Kyrylenko
 Trade Marks GuestKat Nedim Malovic commented on the CJEU judgment in Ferrari SpA v DU, C–720/18 and C–721/18 concerning the scope of ‘genuine use’ in trade mark law. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 9:19 am
| The IP term (thus far) of the millennium: the curious story of the adoption of "patent troll" and "internet trolling" | No pain, no gain: Plausibility in Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Testing the boundaries of subjectivity: Infringement of Swiss-type claims in Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Is SPINNING generic? [read post]
26 May 2019, 2:13 pm
Alex Woolgar takes a look at Ablynx NV and Anor v VHsquared Limited and Ors [2019] EWHC 792 (Pat), a useful judgment concerning the application of the Brussels I Regulation to patent disputes where there is also a purported choice of jurisdiction by contract.CopyrightHayleigh Bosher takes a look at a recent dispute before Judge Hacon in the IntellectualProperty Enterprise Court regarding Eminem's first album. [read post]