Search for: "State v. Brand" Results 1 - 20 of 6,504
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 May 2024, 5:10 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In Pliva, Inc. v Mensing (564 U.S. 604 [2011]), the Supreme Court found that these plaintiffs’ state-law claims against generic manufacturers were preempted by federal law under the Supremacy Clause to the extent that state-law failure-to-warn statutes required generic drugs to provide more stringent, safer warning labels. [read post]
8 May 2024, 2:00 pm
Snell & Wilmer.Sort of off brand for a regular near-AmLaw100 firm, right? [read post]
Starbucks (10(j) Relief Standard):  On April 23, 2024, oral argument before the United States Supreme Court took place in Starbucks Corp. v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 7:43 am by centerforartlaw
Source: USPTO  Rothschild moved to dismiss the complaint under the Second Circuit’s Rogers v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
The FTC recently sued to block Tapestry’s proposed acquisition of Capri, alleging that the effect of the combination of the companies’ handbag brands may be to substantially lessen competition. [read post]
5 May 2024, 10:26 am by Dennis Crouch
  The court stated this type of “umbrella branding” evidence was relevant to assessing the relatedness of the goods under the second DuPont factor. [read post]
3 May 2024, 9:35 am by timothy-abeel
The 7.3 is a V8, which means it has eight cylinders in a V formation — the most common layout for eight-cylinder engines. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
The right mounted court challenges with mixed results for decades, until this June when the Supreme Court’s conservative supermajority ruled in Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
20 Apr 2024, 6:37 pm
TheBelt and Road Initiative was a masterstroke of branding, persuading state after state in theMiddle East that it could play a central role in the geostrategic calculations of the world’sgreatest rising power, with each imagining the growing power it would accrue as a result. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 3:28 am by Eleonora Rosati
This year, the keynote speech will be delivered by Allan James, Senior Hearing Officer at the UKIPO.The event will now dedicate one of its two panels to a discussion of the Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Lidl v Tesco.Starting at 2pm and finishing with drinks and canapes from 6:15pm at Simmons’ offices in Citypoint, Moorgate, the full line up is below:14:00-14:30 – Registration14:30-14:40 – Introduction and welcome (Darren Meale)14:40-15:40 – Panel 1… [read post]
In the third (and final) of our blogs reporting on the UK Court of Appeal decision in Lidl v Tesco, we examine the findings in relation to non-use revocation. [read post]