Search for: "State v. Brecht"
Results 41 - 60
of 65
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Nov 2010, 2:22 am
Galaza, (9th Cir.2002) ("We need not conduct a harmless error review of Strickland [ineffective assistance of counsel] violations under Brecht [v. [read post]
7 Dec 2006, 10:39 am
The Ninth Circuit upheld the exclusion as harmless error under Brecht v. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 11:33 am
As she argued, “Given the strength of Ayala’s prima facie case and the comparative juror analysis his attorneys could have developed if given the opportunity to do so, little doubt exists that counsel’s exclusion from Ayala’s Batson hearings substantially influenced the outcome,” which should have been enough, in her view, to prove that the California Supreme Court’s harmless error determination was contrary to the Supreme Court’s decision in Brecht… [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 12:27 pm
Mason, 527 F.3d 252, 255 (2d Cir. 2008) (citing United States v. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 5:38 am
The panel was unanimous, holding that any Eddings error was harmless under Brecht. [read post]
7 Dec 2006, 10:39 am
The Ninth Circuit upheld the exclusion as harmless error under Brecht v. [read post]
14 May 2015, 2:15 pm
§ 2254 that governs review of a state court's holding that jury instructions could not have reasonably misled the jury on state law; and (2) whether the Sixth Circuit properly found that any alleged error was harmful under Brecht v. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 12:30 pm
”The Sheldon Abend Revocable Trust, v. [read post]
29 May 2013, 11:36 am
Woodall, 12-794, both state-on-top habeas cases. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 8:05 pm
United States, 12-862, which asks the Court to overrule Feres v. [read post]
21 May 2015, 8:19 am
§ 2254 that governs review of a state court’s holding that jury instructions could not have reasonably misled the jury on state law; and (2) whether the Sixth Circuit properly found that any alleged error was harmful under Brecht v. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 8:10 pm
From the first drafts of the upcoming edition: For the Condemned State v. [read post]
27 May 2010, 7:55 pm
Brecht v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 3:06 pm
The United States now uses a life + 70 copyright regime, but only for works created on and after January 1, 1978. [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 4:30 am
Sconnie Nation LLC Doesn’t Conflict with Cariou v. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 9:47 am
Bartee, No. 07-1526 Denial of habeas corpus relief from a conviction for, inter alia, armed assault with intent to kill is affirmed where, regardless of whether petitioner defaulted on claims due to Massachusetts contemporaneous objection rule or whether the state ruling was contrary to or constituted an unreasonable application of federal law, he was unable to show the indispensable habeas requirement of "prejudice" under Brecht v. [read post]
