Search for: "State v. Breda"
Results 1 - 20
of 43
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2012, 6:14 pm
Van Breda and Charron Estate v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 4:40 pm
The Henri Van Breda case (Van Breda v Media 24 Limited and Others [2017] ZASCA 97) has confirmed that cameras in courts are not only here to stay, but that this is mandated by the South African Constitution in order to facilitate open justice and the right of the public to hear and see what goes on in our courts. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 4:50 pm
Interestingly, in Cugalj et al v. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 7:13 am
As the Supreme Court said in Canada (Human Rights Commission) v. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 7:13 am
As the Supreme Court said in Canada (Human Rights Commission) v. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 5:54 am
In Club Resorts Ltd. v Van Breda, 2012 SCC 17, the Supreme Court clarified the rules for when a Canadian court can assume jurisdiction over a claim against a party located outside the jurisdiction. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 7:51 am
The Van Breda Trilogy, by contrast, suggests such an exception may exist in any case involving the tort of defamation, which would represent a significant evolution in the state of the law. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 5:21 pm
Van Breda, 2012 SCC 17 (“Van Breda”); Éditions Écosociété Inc. v. [read post]
20 May 2012, 10:50 am
Among the significant changes introduced by the Van Breda Trilogy is guidance from the Supreme Court of Canada on the forum non conveniens test. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 4:25 am
The decision builds on the court’s foundational decision in Club Resorts Ltd v Van Breda, 2012 SCC 17, which altered the law on taking jurisdiction in cases not involving presence in the forum or submission to the forum. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 4:00 am
Strassberg, Scrutinizing Polygamy: Utah’s Brown v. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 5:42 am
Van Breda“. [read post]
28 Apr 2012, 6:44 pm
That analytical framework was established in the companion case of Club Resorts Ltd. v Van Breda, 2012 SCC 17 (“Club Resorts”), reasons of which were issued at the same time as those in Breeden and Banro. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 5:08 pm
In A.T. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 4:55 am
The case is interesting to me because it’s one of the first looking at the reformulated real and substantial connection test in Van Breda v. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 3:45 am
Issues for the Canadian Supreme Court Jurisdiction in Internet libel claims In Canada, the courts assume jurisdiction where there is “a real and substantial connection… between the forum, the subject matter of the litigation and the defendant” (Club Resorts Ltd v Van Breda 2012 SCC 17 [99]). [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 4:34 am
The case is ACCI v. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 6:41 am
Citing with approval the recent judgment of the International Court of Justice (“ICJ”) in Jurisdictional Immunities of the State (Germany v. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 3:35 am
In Tucows.Com Co. v. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 9:30 pm
Georgetown Law observes the centennial of United States v. [read post]
