Search for: "State v. Brett" Results 61 - 80 of 2,047
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Nov 2023, 4:50 am by John Elwood
Justice Brett Kavanaugh noted (without an opinion) that he would grant the petition. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 2:15 am by INFORRM
The Brett Wilson Media and Communications Law Blog has an article analysing whether AI is an effective tool for legal research. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 2:47 pm by Amy Howe
In the wake of the Supreme Court’s 2022 decision in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 2:20 pm by Ronald Mann
Department of Agriculture Rural Development Rural Housing Service v. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 1:11 am by INFORRM
 On 1 and 2 November 2023, the UK Supreme court (Lords Reed, Sales, Hamblen, Burrows and Richards) heard the appeal in the case of Mueen-Uddin v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 5:07 pm by INFORRM
Hay v Cresswell [2023] EWHC 882 (KB) and Aaronson v Stones [2023] EWHC 2399 (KB) both centred on allegations, published online by the Defendants, that the Claimants had committed acts of sexual violence. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 2:03 am by INFORRM
The Brett Wilson Media and Communication blog has an article exploring how the courts are handling sexual misconduct defamation hearings six years on from the start of the #MeToo movement. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Nonetheless, there is reason to hope that Justices Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett—who fully joined Justice Gorsuch’s opinion in Whole Woman’s Health but did not join his statement in Missouri v. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 5:38 am by Neil Siegel
In a new essay for a symposium on abortion rights being hosted by the Journal of American Constitutional History, I argue that Dobbs v. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 12:00 am by INFORRM
The DfE responded to the investigation by stating it would not be appropriate to comment on individual cases. [read post]
22 Oct 2023, 9:05 pm by Peter Grossi
” Nor did the Fifth Circuit judges respond to the earlier opinions of Justices Samuel Alito, Brett Kavanaugh and John Roberts in Mutual Pharmaceutical v. [read post]