Search for: "State v. Briggs"
Results 21 - 40
of 367
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jul 2022, 2:34 am
However, Lord Briggs and Lord Leggatt reject Mr Basfar’s contention that the same is true of the trafficking and exploitation of a domestic worker by a diplomat. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 2:07 pm
In Missouri v. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 7:11 am
[The case may get refiled, but it’s not looking promising. ] From Atas v. [read post]
30 May 2022, 1:00 am
The Chancellor stated that only because the font is chipped, it may be removed and destroyed. [read post]
15 May 2022, 8:19 am
Indeed, in paragraph 7 of the judgment, Lord Briggs and Lord Sales set out that so-called juridical taxation is a “fact of life”, given that each member state has sovereign authority over its own tax affairs. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 3:11 am
Lord Briggs and Lord Sales reject this. [read post]
1 Apr 2022, 7:43 am
” Ultimately, however, Lord Briggs acknowledged that while there might be room to extend the lien to other legal service providers, th [read post]
27 Mar 2022, 10:52 am
For Lord Briggs, this was a clear forfeiture clause. [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 1:56 pm
This concept was described by Lord Briggs JSC in Gavin Edmondson Solicitors Ltd v Haven Insurance Co Ltd [2018] UKSC 21 as promoting access to justice, as it allows solicitors to provide litigation services on credit to clients with strong cases who do not have the financial means to pay upfront. [read post]
10 Mar 2022, 3:15 am
The Supreme Court closely considered the true construction of the 2002 Act in their judgment, stating that the appeal turned upon the interpretation of the relevant provisions of the legislation. [read post]
20 Feb 2022, 9:30 pm
"—Laura Briggs More information is available here. [read post]
20 Feb 2022, 2:19 pm
They state there that ’we present empirical evidence of “hold-up”—i.e., evidence of opportunistic behavior by SEP enforcers that is intended to unreasonably inflate royalties. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 5:01 am
Keenan, decided Feb. 5 by the Washington Commission on Judicial Conduct but just posted on Westlaw (some paragraph breaks and numbering deleted); the opinion is signed by members Ruth Reukauf, Robert Alsdorf, Ramon Alvarez, Wanda Briggs, Kristian Hedine, Rich Melnick, and Michael Tate: At all times pertinent hereto, Judge Keenan was a Superior Court Judge [in the civil department] for King County, Washington…. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 10:52 pm
For example, 130 people (out of 1.2-1.5 million) opted into the price-fixing case against JJB Sports concerning replica football shirts.[13] Likewise, barely 10,000 out of about 100,000 of Morrison’s employees joined the group action against the supermarket chain for unlawful disclosure of private data on the internet by another employee.[14] Furthermore, s.47C (2) of the Competition Act obviates the need for individual assessment of damages, but limits the requirement to prove damages to the… [read post]
21 Nov 2021, 7:07 am
The psychiatrist stated that SR “doesn’t know how to cook beyond ready meals. [read post]
29 Oct 2021, 1:56 pm
The question whether mere consequential loss satisfies the tort gateway had been considered before by the Supreme Court in the very same case: Brownlie v Four Seasons [2017] UKSC 80; [2018] 2 All ER 91 (“Brownlie I”). [read post]
26 Oct 2021, 12:41 am
It is arguable that Lord Hodge and Lord Briggs’ “subjective intention” test is more in line with the approach taken by the German courts in Östrogenblocker (applied by Hacon HHJ in the case at hand), which introduced a mental element based on foreseeability. [read post]
26 Oct 2021, 12:41 am
It is arguable that Lord Hodge and Lord Briggs’ “subjective intention” test is more in line with the approach taken by the German courts in Östrogenblocker (applied by Hacon HHJ in the case at hand), which introduced a mental element based on foreseeability. [read post]
20 Oct 2021, 4:41 am
In relation to the tort gateway issue, Lord Lloyd-Jones (with whom Lord Reed, Lord Briggs, and Lord Burrows agree) gave the lead judgment. [read post]
25 Aug 2021, 4:55 am
” In a case law context, the five principles governing estoppel by convention were outlined in the decision of Briggs J in Revenue and Customs Commissioners v Benchdollar [2009] EWHC 1310 (Ch) (“Benchdollar”). [read post]
