Search for: "State v. Briggs" Results 41 - 60 of 367
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jan 2020, 5:14 am by Charles Sartain
This decision is only the second application by a state supreme court of the rule of capture to hydraulic fracturing (from Texas, Coastal Oil & Gas Corp. v. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 10:00 am by Evan Lee
During Tuesday’s telephonic oral argument in United States v. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 11:00 am by Evan Lee
The Supreme Court on Thursday unanimously reinstated the rape convictions of three former servicemen in United States v. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 1:52 pm
The First District has the following pro tems helping out until October:Judge Jeffrey Horner, of the Superior Court of the State of California, Alameda County, will be sitting pro tem judge in Division Three until October 23, 2017.Judge John William Kennedy, of the Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa, will be sitting Pro Tem in Division Four until October 13, 2017.Also of note: Lawyer Groups Urge Congress To Not Split 9th Circ.And yes, it's over 120 pages, but you must… [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 12:08 am by INFORRM
Today, 24 January 2019, five Supreme Court judges (Lord Reed, Lord Kerr, Lady Black, Lord Briggs and Lord Kitchin) will hear Stocker v Stocker UKSC 2018/0045, an appeal against the 12 February 2018 Court of Appeal decision of Lady Justice Sharp, with whom Lord Justice McFarlane and Sir John Laws concurred ([2018] EWCA Civ 170). [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 7:15 am by MICHAEL ETIENNE, MATRIX
Judgment in the case of R (Steinfeld & Anor) v Secretary of State for International Development [2018] UKSC 32 is here. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 4:42 pm by INFORRM
The Supreme Court yesterday handed down its long awaited judgment in Lachaux v Independent Print Ltd & Anor [2019] UKSC 27. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 3:15 am by ASAD KHAN
Supreme Court allows tortured Tamil asylum-seeker’s appeal KV (Sri Lanka) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2019] UKSC 10 (6 March 2019) In a recent judgment given by Lord Wilson the Supreme Court unanimously allowed KV’s appeal, remitting the matter to the UT for fresh determination. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 11:16 pm
Lord Briggs and Lord HodgeLord Briggs and Lord Hodge prefer the view of Arnold J ,  whereby  the test is whether the alleged infringer subjectively intended to target the patent-protected market. [read post]
23 Oct 2020, 1:45 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Lord Briggs would have dismissed the appeal despite the respondent’s breach of the duty promptly to notify. [read post]
5 Mar 2021, 12:43 am by CMS
On 25 February 2021, the UK Supreme Court heard the appeal in Anwar v The Advocate General (Representing the Secretary of State for Business Energy and Industrial Strategy). [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 9:30 am by Lovechilde
  A few months later the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in Furman v. [read post]