Search for: "State v. Briggs"
Results 41 - 60
of 367
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jul 2021, 4:24 am
The five principles governing estoppel by convention were outlined in the decision of Briggs J in Revenue and Customs Commissioners v Benchdollar [2009] EWHC 1310 (Ch). [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 2:29 am
The minority (Lord Carnwath, Lord Briggs and Lord Sales) would have held that section 32(1)(c) has no application to mistakes of law. [read post]
27 Jun 2021, 9:01 pm
In United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 3:48 am
The minority (Lord Stephens and Lord Briggs) would have dismissed Libya’s appeal on the first issue. [read post]
21 May 2021, 5:14 am
The appeal was heard on 8 February 2021 before Lord Reed, Lord Briggs, Lord Hamblen, Lord Leggatt and Lord Burrows. [read post]
15 May 2021, 8:51 am
Briggs, 475 U.S. 335, 340 (1986), citing Butz v. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 1:45 am
Lord Briggs gave the main judgment, with which Lord Hodge, Lord Sales and Lord Carloway agree. [read post]
21 Mar 2021, 5:10 pm
Norton Rose Fulbright Data Protection Report had a post “New York State imposes a $1.5 million penalty in cybersecurity breach case”. [read post]
12 Mar 2021, 7:14 am
The court therefore held that the superior court erred in reversing the Board’s decisions in all four appeals Forsyth County Georgia v Mommies Properties, LLC, 2021 WL 926616 (GA App. 3/11/2021) [read post]
5 Mar 2021, 12:43 am
On 25 February 2021, the UK Supreme Court heard the appeal in Anwar v The Advocate General (Representing the Secretary of State for Business Energy and Industrial Strategy). [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 9:30 pm
The National Security Archive et. al. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 1:46 am
Lord Briggs and Lord Hamblen gave the judgment, with which the other members of the Court agreed. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 12:20 pm
" (Fontani v. [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 7:20 am
In Regeneron, Lord Briggs established a number of principles in this assessment of insufficiency which Birss J sought to adapt for cases involved method claims. [read post]
24 Jan 2021, 11:01 pm
McLean & V. [read post]
5 Jan 2021, 2:53 pm
In United States v. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 5:49 am
Senior judges have repeatedly noted the excesses of the Spiliada regime, in terms of the time, expense and judicial resource spent in litigating questions about the appropriate forum (see, most recently, Lord Briggs in Vedanta Resources Plc v Lungowe [2019] UKSC 20, [6]-[14]), yet they and the rule makers have done little or nothing about it. [read post]
30 Dec 2020, 9:00 am
Briggs (Oct. 13) Attorney Craig Goldblatt, City of Chicago v. [read post]
20 Dec 2020, 8:43 am
Robert Chesney and Steve Vladeck shared an episode of the National Security Law Podcast about the latest developments in the TikTok lawsuit and the Justice Department and the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 10:30 am
Briggs. [read post]
