Search for: "State v. Brillon" Results 1 - 20 of 25
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jan 2013, 8:26 am by Rory Little
Brillon suggest that state “negligence” must count against the state, although perhaps not “heavily. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 8:01 am by Rory Little
Brillon, that a complete “breakdown in the public defender system” may be counted against the state [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 12:50 pm
The Supreme Court held that The Vermont Supreme Court erred in ranking assigned counsel essentially as state actors in the criminal justice system, stating that assigned counsel, just as retained counsel, act on behalf of their clients, and, in the absence of institutional breakdowns of the public defender system, delays sought by counsel are ordinarily attributable to the defendants they represent. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 1:10 pm
Brillon, No. 08-88, it appeared to be ready to decide whether delays by court-appointed lawyers provided by the state may sometimes amount to a violation of the right. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 1:21 pm by Paul M. Rashkind
Absent a systemic breakdown in a state public defender system, delays caused by appointed counsel are not attributed to the state for purposes of Barker v. [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 6:30 am
At 11 a.m. today, the Court will hear argument in Vermont v. [read post]
12 Jan 2009, 3:26 am
Brillon (indigent, assigned counsel, Wingo test) Knowles v. [read post]
12 Jan 2009, 1:20 am
Via SCOTUSBlog, the Supreme Court will hear argument tomorrow in Vermont v. [read post]
12 Jan 2009, 12:14 am
So Brillon was so very evil, yet not so evil that the State of Vermont wasn't prepared to overlook the extent of his crimes if he would only drop his appeal? [read post]
10 Jan 2009, 9:00 pm
HIF Bio, Inc. (07-1437) and United States v. [read post]