Search for: "State v. Brink"
Results 1 - 20
of 303
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Mar 2024, 6:02 pm
Like most Americans, I believe Roe v. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 12:08 pm
As the threatened attacks in Rafah have begun, killing untold numbers of civilians, including children, we call on the international community and member states of the UN to act with the utmost urgency to fully ensure respect for the provisional measures ordered by the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in the case regarding the Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide in the Gaza Strip (South Africa v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 5:44 pm
Here at least the labor specialization of states has produced something quite interesting. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 5:00 pm
Putin ("President Vladimir V. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 4:10 pm
See State v. [read post]
21 Jan 2024, 2:49 am
Amending the description and claim-like clausesThe EPO Guidelines for Examination currently require that, when adapting the description, an applicant must either delete subject matter not covered by the claims or explicitly state in the description that such subject matter is not part of the invention (F-IV, 4.3). [read post]
15 Jan 2024, 6:03 am
Gaza is on the brink of famine, and disease is spreading rapidly. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 5:29 am
We are now poised on the brink of a referral on description amendments, courtesy of Roche (T 56/21). [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 5:00 am
States can no longer pretend not to know this. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 1:25 am
(T 0471/20) (Jan 2022)EPO Board of Appeal toes the party-line on description amendments (T 1024/18) (April 2022)Board of Appeal case law against the description amendment requirement starts to mount up (T 2194/19) (16 Nov 2022)Another Board of Appeal enters the fray on description amendments (T 3097/19) (Nov 2022)Board of Appeal poised on the brink of a referral on description amendments (T 56/21) (July 2023)Adding matter by amending the description to exclude… [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 3:30 pm
Nguyen v. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 3:21 pm
Applicable Test The Court applied the test set out in BCE Inc v 1976 Debentureholders (the “BCE Decision”) to determine if the proposed Arrangement should be approved. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 1:00 am
The decision in Ensygnia v Shell is a fresh warning, if one was needed, of the substantial risks of description amendments. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 12:32 pm
Joyce & Wicked Willow Press, LLC v. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 11:54 am
In my Discovery Referee cases I am seeing more motions going to the brink with one party bringing a motion for issue, evidence and/or terminating sanctions. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 1:58 am
Leonid V. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 1:58 am
Leonid V. [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 6:32 am
Many believe that the state is on the brink of a full-blown civil war. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 3:35 am
However, Moore v. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 6:30 am
It was famously rejected in McCulloch v. [read post]
