Search for: "State v. Briseno" Results 1 - 20 of 33
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jan 2017, 4:59 pm
 Because, sure, there are some people who may be keenly interested in the tortured history of competing state court class actions -- and the competing settlements that were then negotiated -- against Safeco Insurance, as well as whether the interlocutory review provisions of CAFA apply to minimal diversity and/or federal question cases.But unless you're a class action/civil procedure geek -- and, I mean, a real geek -- the number of such interested persons is likely to be… [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 3:05 pm
    The American Association of Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities and another group, the Arc of the United States, urged the Court to take the case of Briseno v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 8:35 pm by Ben Cheng
ThalerDocket: 11-1391Issue(s): Whether Texas’s use of the In re Briseno factors -- under which Texas assesses mental retardation using seven factors invented by the state court that rely heavily on the facts of the crime, have no basis in scientific literature, and conflict with the nationally-accepted clinical definition of mental retardation relied on in Atkins v. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 4:17 pm by Randall Hodgkinson
Patricio Briseno, No. 107,351 (Wyandotte)Direct appeal; First-degree murderMatthew J. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 1:14 pm by Brian Stull
Intellectual disability In Moore, the court did what Texas advocates and developmental-disability advocates had long asked: It struck Texas’ Briseno factors – used to exclude intellectually-disabled prisoners from the Eighth Amendment protection against execution, and named for State v. [read post]