Search for: "State v. Bristow "
Results 21 - 40
of 85
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Aug 2016, 11:03 am
| Good news and bad news for bio-pharmaceutical patenting in the United States | HP? [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 6:17 am
The 2014 edition of Chambers & Partners states that "...he has a solid commercial appreciation of what's involved in a case". [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 9:24 am
.* Monarchy in the United States: validity is king, for patents at any rateThis is the first post from Jeremy on IPBC Global 2015 Intellectual Property Business Conference of San Francisco. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 5:32 pm
Reaching consistency throughout the different states seems unlikely. [read post]
27 Sep 2018, 7:18 am
These cases, include BIC Leisure v Windsurfing International (1988), Amsted Industry v National Castings (1990), TP Orthodontics v Professional Positioners (1990) and Magna Electronic v TRW Auto Holdings (2015). [read post]
17 May 2011, 6:00 am
Tim Lowles is an associate at Collyer Bristow. [read post]
16 May 2017, 2:55 am
|Fordham 25|Unwired Planet v Huawei: Is FRAND now a competition law free zone? [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 5:00 am
Rachel Mumby and Claire Phipps-Jones (Bristows LLP) have come to the rescue and provide a summary of this year's proceedings. [read post]
20 Sep 2016, 4:29 am
| Good news and bad news for bio-pharmaceutical patenting in the United States | HP? [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 2:37 pm
In the light of this, the IPKat is delighted to host this guest post from Jeremy Blum, a partner in Bristows LLP and a fellow IP enthusiast to the core. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 2:43 pm
Jeremy reports on the joint BLACA-IPKat event on sensory copyright [on which see earlier Katpost here].* "FAGE, Feta, Fontina": GIs come under scrutinyBusy week of IP events for Jeremy, who this time recounts another tasty seminar entitled "Geographical Indications: FAGE, Feta, Fontina, and the battle for world markets".* A test-drive for the Unified Patent Court: Part III Here Jeremy hosts the third in the series of posts from London-based law firm Bristows (where… [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 2:55 am
However, last week’s High Court, England and Wales, ruling in Enterprise v Europcar [2015] EWHC 300 (Ch) shows this is by no means a settled area, explains katfriend Jeremy Blum(Bristows LLP).* The Richemont ruling and beyond: dealing with counterfeit websites and the intermediaries that host themKatfriend Tim Behean provides another insightful analysis of Cartier International AG and Others v British Sky Broadcasting Ltd and Others [2014]… [read post]
28 Apr 2019, 7:45 am
In Janssen v Teva (2009) the Federal Circuit stated that mere plausibility does not suffice to meet this requirement, if it did then patents could be obtained for little more than “respectable guesses”. [read post]
8 May 2017, 10:17 am
“Does it matter that most innovative activity, at least in the United States, is taking place in a small number of venture capital funded locations? [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 3:05 pm
, was a massive success thanks to the tireless efforts of fellow Kat Eleonora, who conceived and organised it, as well as our hosts, Bristows LLP, who provided full logistical support, refreshments and -- for the first time in an IPKat event -- streaming. [read post]
21 Apr 2013, 3:20 pm
Life after L'Oréal is a topic that both Pail Jordan (Bristows) and Nicholas Saunders (Brick Court) will have a chance to reflect on. [read post]
30 Mar 2019, 6:05 am
As Mr Nolan stated, AI augments and enhances the capabilities of inventors, but it does not replace them. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 3:26 pm
Bently argued strongly it was not), by Article 17 of the Design Directive, Member States retain the right to regulate the breadth of protection afforded to designs by virtue of national copyright laws. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 12:32 pm
Roberts would also represent a number of states in the Microsoft antitrust case, United States v. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 11:58 pm
Paragraph [0003] of the Patent states that the invention is directed to chronic pain disorders. [read post]
