Search for: "State v. Brunell"
Results 1 - 20
of 31
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Feb 2009, 3:18 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Abbey National Plc & Ors v The Office of Fair Trading [2009] EWCA Civ 116 (26 February 2009) Brunel Motor Company Ltd v Revenue and Customs & Anor [2009] EWCA Civ 118 (26 February 2009) BA (Nigeria), R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2009] EWCA Civ [...] [read post]
7 May 2009, 9:31 am
Halpin & V. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 11:32 pm
The opinions are my own and not that of Darlingtons, Brunel University, or the Society of Legal Scholars. [read post]
9 Apr 2007, 4:32 am
State v. [read post]
11 Feb 2024, 4:01 am
Oral Judgments Military: Sexual AssaultR. v. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 12:00 am
Brunel International Inc. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 3:19 am
Plaintiff put forth sufficient detail to establish the negligence of the attorneys, that the negligence was the proximate cause of the losses sustained by the benefits funds, and actual damages to those funds (see Leder v Spiegel, 9 NY3d 836, 837 [2007], cert denied 552 US 1257 [2008]; O'Callaghan v Brunelle, 84 AD3d 581, 582 [2011]). [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 4:11 am
Since damages in a legal malpractice case are designed “to make the injured client whole” (Campagnola v Mulholland, Minion & Roe, 76 NY2d 38, 42 [1990]), having failed to plead actual damages, plaintiff’s complaint fails to state a claim (see Heritage Partners, LLC v Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP, 133 AD3d 428 [1st Dept 2015], lv denied 27 NY3d 904 [2016]; Lavanant v General Acc. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 4:11 am
Since damages in a legal malpractice case are designed “to make the injured client whole” (Campagnola v Mulholland, Minion & Roe, 76 NY2d 38, 42 [1990]), having failed to plead actual damages, plaintiff’s complaint fails to state a claim (see Heritage Partners, LLC v Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP, 133 AD3d 428 [1st Dept 2015], lv denied 27 NY3d 904 [2016]; Lavanant v General Acc. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 3:00 am
Kulik v. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 4:59 am
As for his first personal injury action against the City, the MTA, and related parties, the complaint fails to state a cause of action for malpractice since defendants successfully negotiated [*2]a settlement on his behalf despite an adverse finding by the WCB. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 12:56 pm
| Furry thoughts on Sky v. [read post]
13 May 2009, 4:26 pm
United States v. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 2:15 am
(Stavroula Karapapa & Maurizio Borghi, Brunel University). [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 8:10 am
(Deleted from the list are the “Intellectual Property Postgraduate Certificate” from Brunel University and Bournemouth University. ) It seems that quite a large proportion of currently qualified patent attorneys will be grandfathered in this manner. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 12:55 pm
Sky v. [read post]
8 May 2019, 3:55 am
Further, a legal malpractice claim cannot be stated if there is no attorney-client relationship between the parties (Waggoner v Caruso, 68 AD3d 1, 3 [1 51 Dept2009], affd 14 NY3d 874 [2010]). [read post]
3 May 2022, 6:12 am
De Matos (Brunel University London)The Shadows of Modern State Law: a Visual Genealogy of Dark KnightsSophie Doherty (Dublin City University)What does Justice in the Aftermath of Sexual Violence look like? [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 2:52 am
"The court erred in finding that plaintiff failed to state a cause of action for legal [*2]malpractice as against Fogarty. [read post]
