Search for: "State v. Brunelle"
Results 21 - 36
of 36
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2022, 6:12 am
De Matos (Brunel University London)The Shadows of Modern State Law: a Visual Genealogy of Dark KnightsSophie Doherty (Dublin City University)What does Justice in the Aftermath of Sexual Violence look like? [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 2:52 am
"The court erred in finding that plaintiff failed to state a cause of action for legal [*2]malpractice as against Fogarty. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 5:27 pm
Brunell v. [read post]
8 Apr 2021, 4:59 am
Cases such as Conversant vs ZTE/Huawei, Philips vs TCL, TQ Delta v ZyXel or Optis v Apple pertain equally to the licensing of standard essential patents. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 4:29 am
Further, a legal malpractice claim cannot be stated if there is no attorney-client relationship between the parties (Waggoner v Caruso, 68 AD3d 1, 3 [1st Dept 2009], affd 14 NY3d 874 [2010]). [read post]
11 Apr 2021, 4:40 pm
United States Twitter said that the National Archives will not be allowed to resurrect Donald Trump’s tweets, even in its official capacity as a record-keeping organization. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 2:53 am
However, the malpractice claim must nevertheless be dismissed because the evidentiary materials submitted by the parties conclusively establish that defendants breached no duty to plaintiff, and that no alleged damages were caused by any act of defendants (see O'Callaghan v Brunelle, 84 AD3d 581 [2011], lv [*2]denied 18 NY3d 804 [2012]; Between The Bread Realty Corp. v Salans Hertzfeld Heilbronn Christy & Viener, 290 AD2d 380, 381 [2002], lv denied 98 NY2d 603… [read post]
22 Feb 2009, 4:25 pm
Brunelle-Apley, 11th Dist. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 10:58 pm
Thus, for example, in Jameel v Wall Street Journal Europe SPRL ([2007] 1 AC 359) Baroness Hale argued that the public have a right to know only if there is “a real public interest in communicating and receiving the information. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 11:28 am
Whole Foods[24] and United States v. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 4:11 pm
Statements in Open Court and Apologies Media interest in privacy injunctions was revived with Imogen Thomas’ statement in open court in the case of CTB v NGN, which stated the claimant footballer had accepted there was no basis to accuse her of blackmail. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 1:01 am
Julian Petley is Professor of Journalism at Brunel University London. [read post]
21 Dec 2018, 2:33 am
Gulati and others v MGN Ltd (2015): the unredacted judgement At the time of the trial’s conclusion, and for three years afterwards, only a redacted version of the judgment was available. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 12:37 pm
As an example, she referred to the English case of Marinos v. [read post]
5 Jun 2022, 5:48 pm
Certain states started to relax restrictions around the business and practice of law. [read post]
