Search for: "State v. Bruno" Results 121 - 140 of 282
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Mar 2011, 5:32 am by Mike Scarcella
Super-Sized: The Washington Post examines the closely watched sex discrimination class action Wal-Mart v. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 8:09 am
  It seems that the complete duplication may be “excessive”, in light of the quantity, quality and importance of the material used (Blanch v Koons).Bruno is unimpressed with the dumb Starbucks crownhe has to wear to make his significant human happyIn relation to market effects, would the hundreds of people queuing up for Dumb Starbucks have alternately visited the original coffee retailer that day? [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 11:21 am
 The office of the state public defender has reportedly committed an additional $25,000. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 2:28 pm
As evidenced by Senator Joseph Bruno's news statement recalling the Senate into session Oct. 22, there are multiple unresolved issues that can be negotiated along with a legislative pay raise without reliance upon a judicial one. [read post]
 The Service Employees International Union (SEIU) leads a group of plaintiffs seeking to overturn Prop.22 in Castellanos v State of California (12 January 2021). [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 7:15 am by Ilya Somin
May 14, Time TBA, Istituto Bruno Leoni, Milan, Italy: "Democracy and Political Ignorance: Why Smaller  Government is Smarter"     [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 8:02 pm
But Washington will keep in place until at least April 17 a ban on legal action against foreign firms using property confiscated by the Cuban government since the 1959 revolution, the State Department said.Every U.S. president has suspended on a rotating six-month basis a section of the 1996 Helms-Burton Act that would allow such lawsuits by Cuban-Americans and other U.S. citizens due to opposition from the international community and fears it could create chaos in the U.S. court system… [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 12:40 pm
On appeal Miller argues that the state appellate court unreasonably concluded that McShane's performance at sentencing was not deficient or prejudicial, and he further contends that United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 2:20 pm
On February 1, a unanimous five-judge panel of the New York State Appellate Division, Fourth Department, which is based in Buffalo, ruled in Martinez v. [read post]