Search for: "State v. Bruno" Results 141 - 160 of 282
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jan 2008, 12:36 am
Source: New York State Legislative Retrieval System (LRS), January 15, 2007 For your information we are posting the entire New York Legislature 2007 Chapter Law List as retrieved from the New York Legislative Retrieval System on January 15, 2008. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 11:36 am by Kevin Sheerin
Bruno Piccinini v Comptroller of the State of New York Petitioner, a security service assistant for the State University of New York Police Department, was injured when he tripped on an uneven section of the sidewalk while performing a routine patrol. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 3:36 am
Velazquez, etc., appellant, v Bruno Decaudin, et al., defendants, Arnold Streisfeld, etc., et al., respondents. [read post]
9 May 2021, 7:06 pm
Together with Cuban Foreign Minister Bruno Rodriguez Parrilla she will also prepare for the first EU-Cuba Joint Council meeting at ministerial level within the framework of the PDCA.[10]    The object was to negotiate implementation of the  PDCA, but also to celebrate it as a model of E.U. relations with states whose political and economic systems were in some ways incompatible with those of Europe. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 5:55 pm
  Below are excerpts from the article.And what of Copernicus and Bruno? [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 9:01 pm by Andrew Hudson
  We have previously written at length on decisions of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT), or State or Federal Courts on the classification of goods for customs purposes. [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 8:28 am by Brian Cordery
Brian CorderyBy Nicholas Round On 10 October 2018 the Court of Appeal handed down its judgment in the matter of Icescape Limited v Ice-World International BV & Ors*. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 11:30 am
Prisoners at the Bar - An Account of the Trials of, the William Haywood Case, the Sacco-Vanzetti Case, the Loeb-Leopold Case, the Bruno Hauptmann Case 1st ed. 1 v. (1952) Busch, Francis X. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 7:58 am
  As a matter of constitutional interpretation, Hoke v U.S., 227 U.S. 308 (1913) seemed to suggest that Congress had the power to block movement of people across state lines for any purpose whatsoever. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 10:55 am by Larry
United States for this proposition. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 2:44 pm
”The difficulty here is that many states, having refused to legislate in favour of text and data-mining, are presumably not convinced of their merit. [read post]