Search for: "State v. Buckman"
Results 61 - 80
of 347
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Dec 2015, 12:57 pm
This from counsel practicing in the Tenth Circuit where Caplinger v. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 12:02 pm
A little more than a year ago, back in February 2008, a majority of the Supreme Court stated, in Riegel v. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 7:21 pm
" The authors acknowledge Buckman Co. v. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 2:07 pm
Id. at *38 (quoting Desiano v. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 7:48 am
Relying on 2001’s Buckman Co. v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 6:14 am
After all, since Wyeth v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 2:43 pm
The leading Supreme Court case on the merits is Buckman Co. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 10:27 am
The plaintiff in Frere v. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 5:00 am
The Supreme Court so held in Buckman Co. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 11:10 am
The recent law review article, Johns, "Informed Consent: Requiring Doctors To Disclose Off-Label Prescriptions & Conflicts Of Interest," 58 Hastings L.J. 967 (May, 2007), came to our attention because it cited Buckman (we at least glance at anything citing Buckman). [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 3:22 am
A forum-shopped Philadelphia state-court jury didn't care, and assessed $89 million compensatory and punitive damages against the maker of the carburetor, finding it 100% responsible. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 12:02 pm
Well, that’s what Bausch v. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 8:37 am
Here's a copy: Bryant v. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 5:24 am
The first case is our good friend Buckman Co. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 5:00 am
Garcia v. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 12:01 pm
So, even though it is another favorable InFuse decision and we probably would have blogged about it anyway, the court’s clever turn of phrase was enough to reel us in:In light of Riegeland Buckman, a plaintiff can survive a preemption challenge to a state-law tort claim concerning an allegedly defective medical device only by steering between the Scylla of express preemption under § 360k(a) and the Charybdis of the implied Buckman preemption of claims… [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 8:45 am
Medtonic, 518 U.S. 470 (1996) and Wyeth v. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 3:10 pm
In Deutsch v. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 6:40 am
That changed with the California appellate decision in Coleman v. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 11:22 pm
Such a state court proceeding would raise the same inter-branch-meddling concerns that animated Buckman. [read post]
